Sorry for still bothering with this jena-fuseki logging level issue: I managed 
to solve the problem and this discussion can be forgotten.

Br Jaana


> 18.10.2024 05.49 EEST jaa...@kolumbus.fi kirjoitti:
> 
>  
> Hi Andy,
> > You should upgrade to Jena 5.x to get security updates.
> if you mean vulnerability of log4j2 from year 2021, they said that 
> "The vulnerability of log4j2 does impact Fuseki 3.15 - 3.17, and 4.x.".
> So 3.14 should be safe. I just renamed the file log4j2.properties to 
> log4j.properties, stored it in /jena-fuseki-folder and restarted the 
> container.
> 
> I got these messages:
> 
> 
> log4j:WARN No appenders could be found for logger 
> (org.apache.jena.util.FileManager).
> log4j:WARN Please initialize the log4j system properly.
> log4j:WARN See http://logging.apache.org/log4j/1.2/faq.html#noconfig for more 
> info.
> 
> Do you know what else should I have done ? 
> 
> Jaana
> 
> > 17.10.2024 11.45 EEST Andy Seaborne <a...@apache.org> kirjoitti:
> > 
> >  
> > On 17/10/2024 03:37, jaa...@kolumbus.fi wrote:
> > >   
> > > I'm running docker.io/stain/jena-fuseki:3.14.0 in podman container on 
> > > linux redHat host. I a very heavy load it can happen that 
> > > /var/log/messages-file receives huge amount of INFO-level messages from 
> > > jena-fuseki. How can I change the log level of my container to get rid of 
> > > these messages ?
> > >   
> > > This is similar with 
> > > https://stackoverflow.com/questions/71615972/change-jena-fuseki-logging-level
> > >  
> > > https://stackoverflow.com/questions/71615972/change-jena-fuseki-logging-level
> > >  , but the problem now is that I cannot find the file log4j2.properties 
> > > from inside the container.
> > >   
> > > Br, Jaana
> > 
> > 3.14.0 used log4j1  The file will be called log4j.properties.
> > 
> > If it does not exist, then the server uses a built in default. You can 
> > place a logging setup in the container at the expected pl;ace and it 
> > should use on start-up.
> > 
> > You should upgrade to Jena 5.x to get security updates.
> > 
> >      Andy

Reply via email to