Neha. Thanks so much for response. How can I get under replicated partition count during control shutdown that is configured in the property file?
Thanks, Vadim On Sun, Aug 18, 2013 at 6:11 PM, Neha Narkhede <[email protected]>wrote: > Vadim, > > Controlled shutdown takes 2 parameters - number of retries and shutdown > timeout. In every retry, controlled shutdown attempts to move leaders off > of the broker that needs to be shutdown. If the controlled shutdown runs > out of retries, it proceeds to shutting down the broker even if it still > hosts a few leaders. At LinkedIn, the script to bounce Kafka brokers waits > for the under replicated partition count to drop to 0 before invoking > controlled shutdown on the next broker. The aim is to avoid data loss that > occurs if you shut down a broker that still has some leaders. If the under > replicated count never drops to 0, it indicates a bug in Kafka code and the > script does not proceed to bouncing any more brokers in a cluster. We > measure the time it takes to move "n" leaders off of some broker, and > configure the shutdown timeout accordingly. We also configure the retries > to a small number (2 or 3). If the controlled shutdown fails the retries, > the broker shuts itself down anyways. In general, you want to avoid hard > killing (kill -9) a broker since that means the broker will run a long > running log recovery process on startup. That significantly delays the time > the broker takes to rejoin the cluster. > > Thanks, > Neha > > > On Sun, Aug 18, 2013 at 3:33 PM, Vadim Keylis <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Good afternoon. We are running kafka on centos linux. I enabled > controlled > > shutdown in the property file. We are starting/stopping kafka using init > > script. The init script will issue term signal first followed 3 seconds > > later by kill signal. Is that right process to shutdown kafka? Which > > startup/shutdown/restart script you guys use? What shutdown process > > linkedin uses? What side effects could be after kafka service is killed > > uncleanly using kill -9 signal? > > > > Thanks, > > Vadim > > >
