we would be very happy to contribute. However a description of the current
plan and status regarding tooling would be helpful.
It would speed up the learning curve. You mentioned some jira tickets?

(maybe I should sign up to the developer mailing list and take the
conversation over there)

On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 6:46 PM, Gwen Shapira <gshap...@cloudera.com> wrote:

> Since these tools are so useful, I wonder what it requires (from both
> Airbnb and Kafka) to merge this into Kafka project. I think there are
> couple of Jira regarding improved tool usability that this resolved.
>
> On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 11:45 AM, Alexis Midon
> <alexis.mi...@airbedandbreakfast.com> wrote:
> > distribution will be even based on the number of partitions.
> > It is the same logic as AdminUtils.
> > see
> >
> https://github.com/airbnb/kafkat/blob/master/lib/kafkat/command/reassign.rb#L39
> >
> > On Sun, Sep 14, 2014 at 6:05 PM, Neha Narkhede <neha.narkh...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> This is great. Thanks for sharing! Does kafkat automatically figure out
> the
> >> right reassignment strategy based on even data distribution?
> >>
> >> On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 12:12 AM, Alexis Midon <
> >> alexis.mi...@airbedandbreakfast.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> > Hi Marcin,
> >> >
> >> > A few weeks ago, I did an upgrade to 0.8.1.1 and then augmented the
> >> cluster
> >> > from 3 to 9 brokers. All went smoothly.
> >> > In a dev environment, we found out that the biggest pain point is to
> have
> >> > to deal with the json file and the error-prone command line interface.
> >> > So to make our life easier, my team mate Nelson [1] came up with
> kafkat:
> >> > https://github.com/airbnb/kafkat
> >> >
> >> > We now install kafkat on every broker. Note that kafkat does NOT
> connect
> >> to
> >> > a broker, but to zookeeper. So you can actually use it from any
> machine.
> >> >
> >> > For reassignment, please see:
> >> > `kafkat reassign [topic] [--brokers <ids>] [--replicas <n>] `
> >> > It will transparently generate and kick off a balanced assignment.
> >> >
> >> > feedback and contributions welcome! Enjoy!
> >> >
> >> > Alexis
> >> >
> >> > [1] https://github.com/nelgau
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 10:27 AM, Marcin Michalski <
> >> mmichal...@tagged.com>
> >> > wrote:
> >> >
> >> > > I am running on 0.8.1.1 and I thought that the partition
> reassignment
> >> > tools
> >> > > can do this job. Just was not sure if this is the best way to do
> this.
> >> > > I will try this out in stage env first and will perform the same in
> >> prod.
> >> > >
> >> > > Thanks,
> >> > > marcin
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 7:23 PM, Joe Stein <joe.st...@stealth.ly>
> >> wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > > > Marcin, that is a typical task now.  What version of Kafka are you
> >> > > running?
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Take a look at
> >> > > >
> >> >
> https://kafka.apache.org/documentation.html#basic_ops_cluster_expansion
> >> > > > and
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
> https://kafka.apache.org/documentation.html#basic_ops_increase_replication_factor
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Basically you can do a --generate to get existing JSON topology
> and
> >> > with
> >> > > > that take the results of "Current partition replica assignment"
> (the
> >> > > first
> >> > > > JSON that outputs) and make whatever changes (like sed old node
> for
> >> new
> >> > > > node and add more replica's which increase the replication factor,
> >> > > whatever
> >> > > > you want) and then --execute.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > With lots of data this takes time so you will want to run
> --verify to
> >> > see
> >> > > > what is in progress... good thing do a node at a time (even topic
> at
> >> a
> >> > > > time) however you want to manage and wait for it as such.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > The "preferred" replica is simply the first one in the list of
> >> > replicas.
> >> > > >  The kafka-preferred-replica-election.sh just makes that replica
> the
> >> > > leader
> >> > > > as this is not automatic yet.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > If you are running a version prior to 0.8.1.1 it might make sense
> to
> >> > > > upgrade the old nodes first then run reassign to the new servers.
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > > /*******************************************
> >> > > >  Joe Stein
> >> > > >  Founder, Principal Consultant
> >> > > >  Big Data Open Source Security LLC
> >> > > >  http://www.stealth.ly
> >> > > >  Twitter: @allthingshadoop <
> http://www.twitter.com/allthingshadoop>
> >> > > > ********************************************/
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > > On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 8:59 PM, Marcin Michalski <
> >> > mmichal...@tagged.com
> >> > > >
> >> > > > wrote:
> >> > > >
> >> > > > > Hi, I would like to migrate my Kafka setup from old servers to
> new
> >> > > > servers.
> >> > > > > Let say I have 8 really old servers that have the kafka
> >> > > topics/partitions
> >> > > > > replicated 4 ways and want to migrate the data to 4 brand new
> >> servers
> >> > > and
> >> > > > > want the replication factor be 3. I wonder if anyone has ever
> >> > performed
> >> > > > > this type of migration?
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > Will auto rebalancing take care of this automatically if I do
> the
> >> > > > > following?
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > Let say I bring down old broker id 1 down and startup new server
> >> > broker
> >> > > > id
> >> > > > > 100 up, is there a way to migrate all of the data of the topic
> that
> >> > had
> >> > > > the
> >> > > > > topic (where borker id 1 was the leader) over to the new broker
> >> 100?
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > Or do I need to use *bin/kafka-preferred-replica-election.sh *to
> >> > > reassign
> >> > > > > the topics/partitions from old broker 1 to broker 100? And then
> >> just
> >> > > keep
> >> > > > > doing the same thing until all of the old brokers are
> >> decommissioned?
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > Also, would kafka-preferred-replica-election.sh let me actually
> >> lower
> >> > > the
> >> > > > > number of replicas as well, if I just simply make sure that
> given
> >> > > > > topic/partition was only elected 3 times versus 4?
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > Thanks for your insight,
> >> > > > > Marcin
> >> > > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
>

Reply via email to