Hello, I've come across a (seemingly) strange situation when my Kafka producer gave so uneven distribution across partitions. I found that I used null key to produce messages, guided by the following clause in the documentation: "If the key is null, then a random broker partition is picked." However, after looking at the code, I found that the broker partition is not truly random for every message - instead, the randomly picked partition number sticks and only refreshes after the topic.metadata.refresh.ms expires, which is 10 minutes by default. So, with null key the producer keeps writing to the same partition for 10 minutes.
Is my understanding of partitioning with null key correct? If yes, shouldn't the documentation be fixed then to explicitly describe the sticky pseudo-random partition assignment? Thanks, Yury
