Just assigned reviewers for all the blocker issues. Please always feel free to reassign, the purpose is to drive the review process towards the release.
On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 2:29 PM, Guozhang Wang <[email protected]> wrote: > If time permits, it would be great to have both KAFKA-2397 and KAFKA-2017 > in 0.9.0 as both of them are trying to fix some regressions of the new > consumer compared with the old consumer. > > Priority-wise, I think 2017 is higher than 2397 since upon a broker > shutdown / failure, all connected consumers to this broker will go through > a full rebalance whereas for 2017, upon a consumer shutdown / failure it > will only affect the consumers within the same group. > > Effort-wise, 2397 is simpler than 2017 since we need to consider what ZK > data format to achieve good trade-off between storage / efficiency. > > For now we can work on both of them in parallel: Onur already has a patch > for 2397 that Jason is reviewing, I will re-start working on 2017. > > Guozhang > > On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 12:50 PM, Rajiv Kurian <[email protected]> wrote: > >> A bit off topic but does this release contain the new single threaded >> consumer that supports the poll interface? >> >> Thanks! >> >> On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 1:31 PM, Jun Rao <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > Hi, Everyone, >> > >> > As we are getting closer to the 0.9.0 release, we plan to cut an 0.9.0 >> > release branch in about two weeks from now. In the meantime, we will >> try to >> > resolve most if not all 0.9.0 blockers listed below. >> > >> > >> > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20KAFKA%20AND%20status%20in%20(Open%2C%20%22In%20Progress%22%2C%20Reopened%2C%20%22Patch%20Available%22)%20AND%20priority%20%3D%20Blocker%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%200.9.0.0%20ORDER%20BY%20updated%20DESC >> > >> > Are there any concerns? We will also discuss the 0.9.0 release in >> > tomorrow's KIP meeting. >> > >> > Thanks, >> > >> > Jun >> > >> > > > > -- > -- Guozhang > -- -- Guozhang
