Can you try following?

1) reduce buffer size to exactly 2x of your batch size ?

2) back up and save you old properties file.

3) create a dummy topic

4) produce and consume messages using the new config.

Let us know.

On Wed, 23 May 2018 at 07:02, Omer Litov <omer.li...@imperva.com> wrote:

> Hi,
> Thanks for the quick response.
>
> What I meant is, that had those exceptions on both versions (0.10.1 and
> 1.0.1), so upgrading didn't solve the problem. And the same for increasing
> the cluster size.
>
> Here are the properties we set:
>
> "key.serializer" = "org.apache.kafka.common.serialization.StringSerializer"
> "value.serializer" =
> "org.apache.kafka.common.serialization.ByteArraySerializer"
> "acks" = "all"
> "retries" = 5
> "buffer.memory" = 33554432
> "batch.size" = 16384
> "request.timeout.ms" = 50000
>
>
> thanks,
> Omer
>
> On 22/05/2018, 8:14 PM, "M. Manna" <manme...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>     Hi,
>
>     You said "On all of those setting there was no change in the described
>     behavior" - this is slightly confusing. Could you please clarify this?
> If
>     there is no change, that means everything is working :) ?
>
>     From the provided exception stack, it seems as if you are waiting to
> batch
>     a lot of request but they are getting timed out for some reasons.
>     How have you upgraded the cluster to 1.0.1, and have you changed any
> config?
>
>     Regards,
>
>
>     On 22 May 2018 at 16:32, Omer Litov <omer.li...@imperva.com> wrote:
>
>     > Hi,
>     > I have 4 producers, writing to a kafka cluster with 12 partitions.
>     > Periodically (about once per hour or two), we get exceptions while
> trying
>     > to send messages to kafka.
>     > The exceptions are “Expiring 12 record(s) for
> <topic_name>-<partition>:
>     > 49193 ms has passed since batch creation plus linger time”.
>     > We get that for all partitions (some more than others).
>     > When those exceptions arrive, they usually come a few hundred
> together in
>     > under a second, and then stops.
>     > We don’t see any indications for retries (even though they are
> configured).
>     >
>     > We first used a cluster of 3 brokers with version 0.10.1.
>     > Then upgraded to version 1.0.1 (with 3 brokers), and eventually added
>     > additional 2 brokers.
>     > On all of those setting there was no change in the described
> behavior.
>     >
>     >
>     > Would appreciate any lead on investigation the issue.
>     >
>     >
>     > Thanks,
>     > Omer
>     > -------------------------------------------
>     > NOTICE:
>     > This email and all attachments are confidential, may be proprietary,
> and
>     > may be privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure. They are
> intended
>     > solely for the individual or entity to whom the email is addressed.
>     > However, mistakes sometimes happen in addressing emails. If you
> believe
>     > that you are not an intended recipient, please stop reading
> immediately. Do
>     > not copy, forward, or rely on the contents in any way. Notify the
> sender
>     > and/or Imperva, Inc. by telephone at +1 (650) 832-6006 and then
> delete or
>     > destroy any copy of this email and its attachments. The sender
> reserves and
>     > asserts all rights to confidentiality, as well as any privileges
> that may
>     > apply. Any disclosure, copying, distribution or action taken or
> omitted to
>     > be taken by an unintended recipient in reliance on this message is
>     > prohibited and may be unlawful.
>     > Please consider the environment before printing this email.
>     >
>
>
>

Reply via email to