In log4j.properties, can you make the following change (you can keep
whatever follows the first comma in the rootLogger line):
log4j.rootLogger=DEBUG
log4j.logger.org.apache.kafka=DEBUG
FetchSession.scala is in kafka.server package. You can just turn on DEBUG
for this package.
FYI
On Wed, Jun 13, 2018 at 9:08 AM, Mark Anderson <manderso...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Ted
>
> I don't see any other INFO log messages so I assume that means it is the
> DEBUG case I'm seeing?
>
> I don't have DEBUG enabled at the moment.
>
> Thanks
>
> On Wed, 13 Jun 2018, 00:21 Ted Yu, <yuzhih...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Before Errors.INVALID_FETCH_SESSION_EPOCH is returned,
> FetchSession.scala
> > would log the reason for the response.
> > There are 3 cases, 2 with info log and 1 with debug log.
> > Here is one code snippet:
> >
> > if (session.epoch != reqMetadata.epoch()) {
> >
> > debug(s"Created a new error FetchContext for session id ${
> > session.id}: expected " +
> >
> > s"epoch ${session.epoch}, but got epoch $
> > {reqMetadata.epoch()}.")
> >
> > new SessionErrorContext(Errors.
> INVALID_FETCH_SESSION_EPOCH,
> > reqMetadata)
> >
> > Can you pastebin the log line preceding what you pasted ?
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 3:12 PM, Mark Anderson <manderso...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > We recently updated our Kafka brokers and clients to 1.1.0. Since the
> > > upgrade we periodically see INFO log entries such as
> > >
> > > INFO Jun 08 08:30:20.335 61161458 [KafkaRecordConsumer-0]
> > > org.apache.kafka.clients.FetchSessionHandler [Consumer
> > > clientId=consumer-1,
> > > groupId=group_60_10] Node 3 was unable to process the fetch request
> with
> > > (sessionId=819759315, epoch=145991): INVALID_FETCH_SESSION_EPOCH.
> > >
> > > I see that this message comes from the changes introduced in KIP-227:
> > > Introduce Incremental FetchRequests To Increase Partition Stability
> > > <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-
> > > 227%3A+Introduce+Incremental+FetchRequests+to+Increase+
> > > Partition+Scalability>.
> > > However, I cannot find any detailed information about why this message
> > > would appear or what parameters might have to be tuned after its
> > > introduction.
> > >
> > > So far it doesn't seem to have an impact on consumer behaviour with
> > respect
> > > to receiving records but I would like to understand
> > >
> > > 1. Why is the message being logged?
> > > 2. Do I need to do anything?
> > > 3. Can anything be done to stop it being logged?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Mark
> > >
> >
>
