Note that 2.5.1 has now been released. Ismael
On Sun, Aug 2, 2020 at 11:13 AM Ismael Juma <ism...@juma.me.uk> wrote: > Hi Marina, > > If you upgrade to ZK 3.5.x, I highly recommend going with 3.5.8. It has a > few critical fixes when compared to 3.5.6. Also, Kafka 2.5.1 should be out > in a few days and I'd recommend that over 2.4.1. > > Ismael > > On Sun, Aug 2, 2020 at 10:04 AM Marina Popova > <ppine7...@protonmail.com.invalid> wrote: > >> >> Actually, I'm very interested in your experience as well.... I'm about to >> start the same (similar) upgrade - from Kafka 0.11/ZK3.4.13 to Kafka 2.4/ZK >> 3.5.6 >> >> I have Kafka and ZK as separate clusters. >> >> My plan is : >> 1. rolling upgrade the Kafka cluster to 2.4 - using the >> inter.broker.protocol.version set to 0.11 at first >> 2. rolling upgrade ZK cluster to 3.5.6 >> 3. set inter.broker.protocol.version=2.4.0 and rolling restart the Kafka >> cluster again >> >> Anybody sees a problem with this approach? >> >> >> thanks, >> Marina >> >> >> Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email. >> >> ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ >> On Thursday, July 23, 2020 4:01 PM, Andrey Klochkov <akloch...@liftoff.io> >> wrote: >> >> > Hello, >> > We're upgrading our Kafka from 1.1.0 to 2.4.1 and I'm wondering if ZK >> needs >> > to be upgraded too (we're currently on 3.4.6). The upgrade guide says >> that >> > "kafka has switched to the XXX version of ZK" but never says if >> switching >> > to a newer ZK is mandatory or not. What are the guidelines on keeping >> Kafka >> > and ZK compatible? >> > >> > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> > >> > Andrey Klochkov >> >> >>
