I did implement the simple and weighted round-robin for load balancing in Kannel .... I even sumbit the patches for it last time .... Did you guys get it ? I will resubmit again with the latest CVS within these few days and I hope you guys can give some feedback.
Cheers, Hong Cheng --- Oded Arbel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, 2002-02-11 at 12:19, Ian Daly wrote: > > need to set denied-smsc-id aswell to ensure that > the access you've set works > > as you expect? > > That's the whole point - I don't want access control > - I want load > balancing. that's why prefered-smsc-id is better, > like you suggested. > > > > That's was what I'm trying to get - a clear idea > of the load balancing > > > algortihm. from my test it looks like randomal, > which is (IMHO) not a > > > good idea for a small number of SMSCs (is there > a kannel setup in use > > > somewhere with a large number of SMSCs ?). > > > > For the routing, I think if you don't set > preferred-smsc-id, then it is > > random. If you do, then as long as that smsc is > available it should go there > > (not taking into account any retry mechanism). > > What about if I set prefered-smsc-id to all the > SMSCs ? like this > > smsc-id = 100 > prefered-smsc-id = 100;200;300 > > smsc-id = 200 > prefered-smsc-id = 100;200;300 > > smsc-id = 300 > prefered-smsc-id = 100;200;300 > > will it then be random ? or round robin ? or just > catch the first one > (100) everytime ? > > -- > Oded Arbel > m-Wise inc. > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- > You've got more rolls than a bakery and more chins > than a Chinese phone > book! > > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Send FREE Valentine eCards with Yahoo! Greetings! http://greetings.yahoo.com
