I patched the file which worked without any error but got this when compiling 
the new file:

gcc -D_REENTRANT=1 -I. -Igw -g -O2 -DBROKEN_PTHREADS=1 -
I/usr/local/include/libxml2 -I/usr/include/openssl -o gw/smsc/smsc_at2.o -c 
gw/smsc/smsc_at2.c
gw/smsc/smsc_at2.c: In function `at2_wait_modem_command':
gw/smsc/smsc_at2.c:538: structure has no member named 
`pending_incoming_messages'
gw/smsc/smsc_at2.c: In function `at2_read_pending_incoming_messages':
gw/smsc/smsc_at2.c:667: structure has no member named 
`pending_incoming_messages'
gw/smsc/smsc_at2.c:672: structure has no member named 
`pending_incoming_messages'
gw/smsc/smsc_at2.c: In function `at2_read_sms_memory':
gw/smsc/smsc_at2.c:787: structure has no member named 
`pending_incoming_messages'
gw/smsc/smsc_at2.c: In function `at2_device_thread':
gw/smsc/smsc_at2.c:1020: structure has no member named 
`pending_incoming_messages'
gw/smsc/smsc_at2.c:1056: structure has no member named 
`pending_incoming_messages'
gw/smsc/smsc_at2.c: In function `smsc_at2_create':
gw/smsc/smsc_at2.c:1143: structure has no member named 
`pending_incoming_messages'
make: *** [gw/smsc/smsc_at2.o] Error 1

----- Ursprüngliche Nachricht -----
Von: Steve Kennedy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Datum: Freitag, 30. Mai  2003, 11:50
Betreff: Re: CMS ERROR/SMS Masssending/Siemens M20

> On Fri, May 30, 2003 at 10:03:10AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> 
> > How can I get access to your modified code? The version I use know is 
> 1.3.1 
> > which I downloaded and compiled under a Suse Linux distribution 8.0. Do 
> I get 
> > your updated by downloading the newest src from the cvs? I also check 
> the 
> > signal quallity (AT+CSQ) which seems to be ok.
> 
> I think the included patch is what you want, I lost the oringal patch, so
> diffed the orig with the patched version ... also forgot the author :(
> I thought I'd archived it (I probably have somewhere very secure ...).
> 
> Steve
> 
> -- 
> NetTek Ltd Phone/Fax +44-(0)20 7483 2455
> SMS steve-pager (at) gbnet.net [body] gpg 1024D/468952DB 2001-09-19
>


Reply via email to