An additional question: If I run script,to parse ~ 2000 phone numbers (from database or file) and send via kannel in about 2-3 seconds or maybe faster, does it meen, that I send more then 200 msgs/s? :-) What will happen? Tomorow I will do this. I have alredy tested with ~ 450 msgs. It took some minutes till last msg was sent. but if there is store limit ~ 1000 msgs, other 1000 msgs will not be sent anymore? Then maybe I must make sleep in script for every 100 msgs ~ 1 minute or something like that?
Ivars Message: 7 Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2004 12:26:50 -0800 (PST) From: Lourens Janse van Rensburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: Kannel benchmark To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Hello, I don't know if there's an official benchmark (haven't been to the website in a long time). By just sending "Hello, world" to fakesmsc at variable rates, here's what I've found: Max messages straight through without queueing them: 44 msgs/sec Higher than that, Kannel (is it the bearerbox or the smsbox?) starts queueing them and the store size keeps on growing. Invoking the URL http://localhost/sendsms at a rate of 200 msgs/s I've grown my store until it contained about 1000 msgs, and then I stopped sending more. The store got purged, also at a rate of about 44 msgs/sec until it was empty again. That was just to see if the software can handle it. Running RedHat 9 on a 2 GHz Pentium 4 laptop. But in actual fact the SMSCs I've worked with only handle about 17-20 msgs/sec over a TCP/IP connection, using SMPP or a similar TCP/IP protocol. Anyone alse tried to stress-test Kannel? Why would you want to handle 100, 150 or 200 sms/sec in the first place? Lourens Janse van Rensburg... --- melvin sandoval <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi. > May I get any help ? > > I am finding out how to determine the hardware requeriments > (CPU, RAM & DISK) to handle 100, 150 and 200 sms per second using > kannel as sms gateway. > Is there a kannel benchmark ? > > Thanks in advance. > > Melvin.
