Thanks for the info. We have moved forward and will be implementing Kannel against a direct SMSC connection using SMPP
One this is achieved I will attempt to correlate some statistics for you all on this connection. Thanks S ----- Original Message ----- From: "James Coleman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Guillaume Cottenceau" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, June 04, 2004 2:16 PM Subject: Re: REF:- Bulk SMS > On Fri, Jun 04, 2004 at 02:06:10PM +0200, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote: > > np :) however, notice that these are not figures with real SMSC > > connections, but with the "fake" SMSC, which will certainly have > > a lower response time and a lighter protocol. > > Noted. Thanks! :) > I sort of supposed as much but didn't know exactly what was tested of course. > It's quite good at least to have an idea of such figures. > > > > Can anyone do better than that? :) > > > > His figures are obtained using a GSM phone, not an SMSC, so these > > are not very interesting either for your aim IMHO. > > > > Mnnn. Yes. But they're the best I've found so far. > If our customer ever starts to use kannel I would be in a position to collect > some useful statistics but will just have to wait .... > > Thanks again! > > James. > > >
