On Fri, 27 Aug 2004 01:05:36 +0200 Stipe Tolj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dimitri Aivaliotis wrote: > > > Hello > > > > Just wondering if anyone else has noticed this: > > > > Using 1.3.2 on FreeBSD 5.2.1, I notice the following flags in the logfile: > > > > [flags:-1:0:-1:-1:-1] > > > > But with 1.3.1 on Linux 2.4.20, I see the following: > > > > [flags:0:1:0:0:0] > > > > for the same type of message. > > > > Those using 1.3.2: Do you see the same thing? > > > > I don't know if this is something I should be worrying about. > > this is _intended_. This is a "compatibility breaker" change from > 1.3.1 to 1.3.2. > > Always(!) read the NEWS file for new versions and see if "behaviour > changes" are documented there. Which in this case is. See > > http://www.kannel.org/download/1.3.2/NEWS-1.3.2 > > and search for the (!!!) in the compatibility breaker section. > > ;) > I did read http://www.kannel.org/news.shtml#1.3.2, but from: >(!!!) smsbox's sendsms interface changed for values passed to various >variables, >according to this: pid=0 says that you want a pid value in >pdu, with value 0; mclass >is now 0-3; coding is 0-2; alt-dcs is 0-1; >mwi is 0-7 to comply with ETSI values; >dlrmask and dlrurl query >parameters are deprecated, but still functional; please use >dlr-mask >and dlr-url; flash was removed. I didn't quite get that the flags in the logfile would now be swapped/different. :) So, are the flags then alt-dcs? And 0-1 is not a range like I thought, but really means "either 0 or -1"? - Dimitri -- Dimitri Aivaliotis EveryWare AG Birmensdorferstrasse 125 8003 Zurich tel: +41 (1) 466 60 00 fax: +41 (1) 466 60 10
