If the world was stuck with low bandwidth that would probably happen.
However, you might have heard that "necessity is the mother of
invention"

In other words, there is no need to invent binary parsing browsers for
PCs since there is not need for it.

Furthermore is would require that web servers have yet another process
layer to copile web content, which would slow down the server. In which
case there would be more of an expense to upgrade the hardware, or add
external hardware, to do the binary compilation.

Browsers that parse HTML as well as binary data would have to be
redistributed all over the world.

It's an undertaking without necessity.

The nearest thing to it is compressed www data delivery, commonly called
'acceleration'. An example of this would be from Netzero (
http://www.netzero.net/signup/faqs-accel.html )

-Mike

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Yasser Sultan
Sent: Friday, December 24, 2004 7:08 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Gateway for all www



I get no reply ? :-(


>From: "Yasser Sultan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: [email protected]
>Subject: Gateway for all www
>Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2004 17:25:57 +0000
>
>
>I ask this question as a WAP gateway changes everything into binary
>code
>and sends it to the mobile device for viewing  for the purpose of
saving 
>bandwidth
>
>Take the example of normal  webpages they get transferred as plain text
>why
>not transfer them as a binary? and use a compatible browser that can 
>interpret the content to render web pages
>
>Won't this save us bandwidth, so why this method is not used for the 
>general internet?
>
>Please correct me if I am wrong.
>
>Thanks
>
>_________________________________________________________________
>Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today it's
>FREE!
>http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/
>
>

_________________________________________________________________
Don't just search. Find. Check out the new MSN Search! 
http://search.msn.com/




Reply via email to