Re: testing ppg messages with WTP PUSH

[Ivonne Ivonne]

Hi Aarno!

 

Yeah my phone support confirmed push :)

 

Really my main problem is that I want to send a connection oriented push with Kannel (I mean WTP + WSP  Push and not only WSP Push) How can I do that? Does kannel support connection oriented push?

 

Where should I do the configurations to send a connection oriented push? In the kannel configuration file or only in the PAP.

In fact I'm using the kannel as a wap gateway with  WTLS + WTP + WSP protocols ( secure connection oriented) and it works well, for WTLS I'm using the kannel patch. And now I would like to send push alerts to my phones.

 

Thanks a lot for your help

Regards,

Ivonne

Aarno Syv�nen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

First i want to ask a question: do your phone really support confirmed
push ?
(Could use a phone like that myself ;)

Aarno

On 27.3.2005, at 18:10, Ivonne Ivonne wrote:

> Hello Aarno and Dziugas,
>  
> I really appreciate your help!
>  
> Up to Now, I can send messages with WSP Push, it is a good progress
> for me ... but now I need to send messages with WTP Push and I have
> some problems.
>  
> I'm getting this warning in the wapbox and the message is not sent:
> 2005-03-27 10:43:06 [14] WARNING: PPG: handle_push_message: wrong app
> id for confirmed push session creation
>  
> What does "wrong app id" mean?
>  
> **********************************************
>  
> My wapbox.log
> 2005-03-27 10:43:06 [11] DEBUG: HTTP: Creating HTTPClient for
> `172.24.249.45'.
> 2005-03-27 10:43:06 [14] DEBUG: PPG: ip_allowed_by_ppg: ip found from
> allowed list
> 2005-03-27 10:43:06 [14] INFO: PPG: Accept request
> from <172.24.249.45>
> 2005-03-27 10:43:06 [14] DEBUG: PPG: http_read_thread: pap multipart
> accepted
> 2005-03-27 10:43:06 [14] INFO: client address was <10.98.146.251>,
> accepted
> 2005-03-27 10:43:06 [14] DEBUG: PAP COMPILER: doing semantic analysis
> for address type a IPv4 address
> 2005-03-27 10:43:06 [14] DEBUG: using defaults instead of anys
> 2005-03-27 10:43:06 [14] DEBUG: PPG: http_read_thread: pap control
> entity compiled ok
> 2005-03-27 10:43:06 [14] DEBUG: PPG: transform_message: push message
> content and headers valid
> 2005-03-27 10:43:06 [14] DEBUG: PPG: push machine 6 created
> 2005-03-27 10:43:06 [14] DEBUG: PPG: store_push_data: push machine 6
> appended to push list of sm machine 0
> 2005-03-27 10:43:06 [14] DEBUG: PPG: send_push_response: telling pi
> 2005-03-27 10:43:06 [14] DEBUG: HTTP: Resetting HTTPClient for
> `172.24.249.45'.
> 2005-03-27 10:43:06 [14] INFO: PPG: handle_push_message: push message
> accepted for processing
> 2005-03-27 10:43:06 [14] WARNING: PPG: handle_push_message: wrong app
> id for confirmed push session creation
> 2005-03-27 10:43:06 [14] DEBUG: PPG: send_push_response: telling pi
> 2005-03-27 10:43:06 [10] DEBUG: HTTP: Destroying HTTPClient area
> 0x817bbd8.
> 2005-03-27 10:43:06 [10] DEBUG: HTTP: Destroying HTTPClient for
> `172.24.249.45'.
>  
> This is my PAP.xml, with      delivery-method="confirmed"  for sending
> as WTP Push
>  
>
> > "http://www.wapforum.org/DTD/pap_1.0.dtd">
>
>   >  deliver-before-timestamp="2005-06-04T06:45:00Z"
>  deliver-after-timestamp="2004-02-27T06:45:00Z"
>  progress-notes-requested="false">
>    

>     >      priority="low"
>      delivery-method="confirmed"
>         network-required="true"
>  network="IDEN"
>  bearer-required="true"
>  bearer="Packet Data"/>
>  
>
>  
>  
> Thanks in advance and Regards,
> Ivonne
>
>  
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com