On Thu, 14 Apr 2005, Anand Gupta wrote:

May i ask if you are a kannel code hacker as well, since you know so much
on kannel ? I see the message_id feature is required by other users as
well however no one seems to have gotten to it. I was kind of interested
to explore the possibility of getting it done and then perhaps submit it
to kannel development team for review. This way who so ever wants the
feature will benefit from this.

I am not, yet. I may need to become one to get this implemented, though there are many in the devel list that are more talented and better versed in the inner workings than I.

 There is a bit of a developer dispute on how to pass the message_id.  Some
 feel that implementing the ts variable with the message_id will make the
 kannel code impure, since the ts variable is really for a timestamp, not
 an arbitrary message id.  Evaluating the DLR URL at the time of storing
 the DLR for the message to replace an escape code with the message id has
 been poo-pooed as well as a hack.  Adding a new variable that would not
 replace but be in addition to the ts variable has been suggested but
 sneered at since the bearerbox knows the message ID but the smsbox is
 responsible for calling the DLR url.

 The great thing about open source is that you can fuss with it yourself to
 make it work.  The bad thing about open source is that when the core
 developers see a way around a problem (i.e. the DLR report from your SMSC
 give you the message ID without code modifications, so why modify the code
 that works just fine for both SMSC and direct phone connections), they
 don't regard the problem as highly.  And usually the core developers are
 the heaviest users of their own code, and they haven't found a need to
 store the message ID (it seems, I'm presuming a lot here), so it hasn't
 been a priority.

 I wonder if cash thrown at the developers would maybe get a few arbitrary
 features put into kannel, done "the right way"...

Beckman
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Peter Beckman                                                  Internet Guy
[EMAIL PROTECTED]                             http://www.purplecow.com/
---------------------------------------------------------------------------



Reply via email to