Hi, If I use the immediate-sendsms-reply = true do I still need to change the source as per your comment " I suggest to remove the config options from cfg.dev, and remove the if conditions from source, and just do what whould have been done if its enabled. (there is no else case in any of these if's.)"
Thanks again for the insight. Rgds -----Original Message----- From: Wilfried Goesgens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 08 August 2005 14:05 To: Hillel Subject: Re: immediate-sendsms-reply = true On Mon, Aug 08, 2005 at 10:47:36AM +0200, Hillel wrote: > Hi, > > The immediate-sendsms-reply = true option in the smsbox for large load is > interesting. > > But you also mentioned "I would suggest to remove this config option and its > if's from smsbox, as i 've experienced too, that it makes kannel extremely > unreliable." > > Are you saying this option makes the system more unreliable? > And if so, what do you suggest? it really does. smsbox doesn't close inbound http connections anymore, and runs out of file descriptors. This wasn't that extreme with kannel CVS versions prior to last x-mas. But now, a kannel not configured with that options renders allmost unusable. The scripts feeding kannel block because of kannel not closing the connection. and if you add a timeout in the http connection, smsbox doesn't close the fd. I suggest to remove the config options from cfg.dev, and remove the if conditions from source, and just do what whould have been done if its enabled. (there is no else case in any of these if's.) > > Thanks for the insight. > > > --
