Hey, On Mon, 2005-08-29 at 15:58 +0530, Jeetendra Singh wrote: > Just a question, why to implement it on a per message basis? I assume > that esm_class is a SMSC-connection feature and thus should be a SMPP > "smsc" group parameter in configuration file.
Good question. The answer is, really, I needed it to be that way. Feel free to change it as you wish. -- .O. ..O Enver ALTIN | http://skyblue.gen.tr/ OOO Software developer @ Parkyeri | http://www.parkyeri.com/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
