Hi Vincent: I don´t see the need of using Kannel, as you will be receiving and answering HTTP requests. All you will need is a webserver plus application server (this may include a database) which may run on the same machine.
I hope this makes things a bit more clear. Best regards. Rodrigo. On 10/11/05, Vincent Gulinao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The setup: > - we don't have direct access to the SMSC, another party does (not using > kannel). > - we act as some kind of a 3rd party content provider. > - all incoming messages/requests will be forwarded to us tru some kind of > protocol, most likely http (easiest) > - messages/request will be processed on our end > - outgoing messeges/contents will be passed back to them for the actual > sending, again tru http most likely > > Is kannel most suitable for this kind of setup? If so, what are the > advantages over a regular web app server setup? > > I found the section "HTTP-based relay" on the users manual. This is just > what I need, right? > > TIA. >
