Centos IS pretty common! It's an Open Source clone of RHEL (version 3 and 4 respectively). It's decently safe, rock solid and very well mantained. I deeply recommend it for production-level.
I've used CentOS 3.3 and 4.3 in production for years and never had a single issue with it. If in doubt about glibc, you can upgrade CentOS 4.2 to 4.3 seamlessly running "yum -y update". It's a simple and pretty riskless upgrade. Maybe that fixes your glibc problem, I don't know for sure, though... What I can tell you from my own experience is that I've succesfuly used kannel 1.2.1, 1.3.x, 1.4.x and CVS head with sqlbox, mysql support and ssl with no problems on CentOS 3.3 first and lately on 4.3. Hope it helps. Alejandro. On 8/24/06, Mindaugas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I am using Centos 4.2 i386 on an intel p3 machine. > > so this is a glibc panic situation.... what should we say here? -> out of Kannel > scope. > > Suggestion: take a more common Linux distro: FC4,5 or debian. Hm. I'd not be surprised to find that in production level servers Centos 4.x is more common than FC or Debian. :) Mindaugas
-- Alejandro Guerrieri Magicom http://www.magicom-bcn.net/ LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/aguerrieri
