Hi
No,
you do not need to patch kannel 1.41 any more for use it with
mbuni.
Regards
Alvaro
-----Mensaje original-----
De: Eyram Schwinger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Enviado el: Miércoles, 01 de Noviembre de 2006 05:26
Para: kannel
Asunto: kannel 1.4.1 and mbuniHi,
Has anyone tried installing mbuni with kannel 1.4.1. My main question is that do you have to patch 1.4.1 also. Because the mbuni website talks about patching kaneel 1.4.0 not 1.4.1 so can someone help me with the procedure for installing mbuni for kannel 1.4.1 and the necassary files required as in mbuni files. Help . When I try patching 1.4.0 with the mbuni patch for 1.4.0 this is the output I get
patching file Makefile.in
Hunk #1 FAILED at 262.
Hunk #2 FAILED at 360.
2 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file Makefile.in.rej
patching file gw/ota_compiler.c
Hunk #1 FAILED at 91.
Hunk #2 FAILED at 104.
Hunk #3 succeeded at 405 with fuzz 2 (offset 225 lines).
Hunk #4 FAILED at 582.
Hunk #5 FAILED at 641.
Hunk #6 FAILED at 670.
Hunk #7 FAILED at 702.
Hunk #8 FAILED at 721.
Hunk #9 succeeded at 578 (offset 68 lines).
Hunk #10 FAILED at 595.
Hunk #11 FAILED at 630.
Hunk #12 FAILED at 646.
Hunk #13 FAILED at 666.
Hunk #14 FAILED at 693.
12 out of 14 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file gw/ota_compiler.c.rej
patching file gw/ota_prov.c
Hunk #1 FAILED at 70.
Hunk #2 FAILED at 91.
Hunk #3 FAILED at 114.
Hunk #4 FAILED at 125.
Hunk #5 FAILED at 191.
Hunk #6 FAILED at 217.
6 out of 6 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file gw/ota_prov.c.rej
patching file gw/ota_prov.h
Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected! Assume -R? [n]
Apply anyway? [n]
Skipping patch.
1 out of 1 hunk ignored -- saving rejects to file gw/ota_prov.h.rej
patching file gw/smsbox.c
Hunk #1 FAILED at 1210.
Hunk #2 FAILED at 2740.
Hunk #3 FAILED at 2751.
Hunk #4 FAILED at 2880.
Hunk #5 succeeded at 3402 with fuzz 2 (offset 483 lines).
Hunk #6 FAILED at 3447.
Hunk #7 FAILED at 3469.
6 out of 7 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file gw/smsbox.c.rej
patching file gw/xml_shared.h
Hunk #1 FAILED at 82.
1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file gw/xml_shared.h.rej
patching file gwlib/conn.c
Hunk #1 succeeded at 1343 (offset 28 lines).
Hunk #2 succeeded at 1354 with fuzz 1 (offset 22 lines).
Hunk #3 FAILED at 1402.
1 out of 3 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file gwlib/conn.c.rej
patching file gwlib/conn.h
Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected! Assume -R? [n]
Apply anyway? [n]
Skipping patch.
1 out of 1 hunk ignored -- saving rejects to file gwlib/conn.h.rej
patching file gwlib/mime.c
Hunk #1 FAILED at 191.
Hunk #2 succeeded at 239 with fuzz 2 (offset 24 lines).
Hunk #3 FAILED at 358.
Hunk #4 succeeded at 445 with fuzz 2 (offset -4 lines).
2 out of 4 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file gwlib/mime.c.rej
patching file gwlib/mime.h
Hunk #1 succeeded at 167 (offset 26 lines).
patching file test/test_ppg.c
Hunk #1 FAILED at 81.
Hunk #2 FAILED at 648.
Hunk #3 FAILED at 784.
3 out of 3 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file test/test_ppg.c.rej
patching file wap/wsp_headers.c
Hunk #1 FAILED at 122.
1 out of 5 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file wap/wsp_headers.c.rej
patching file wap/wsp_headers.h
is that a successful or failed patch.
Inbox full of spam? Get leading spam protection and 1GB storage with All New Yahoo! Mail.
