Hi Ben,
           Thanks for you reply. I dont know what is the source address,
the smsc assigned to us. So we have set the following variable values like
this in the smsc group configuration.
        source-addr-ton=0
       source-addr-npi=0
        dest-addr-ton=1
        dest-addr-npi=1
Now, I am receiving another error message, that is "invalid destination
address" from smsc.
We have used only ten digit mobile number for destination address. Can you
please tell whether
we need to specify any country code or international code as the prefix of
the mobile number ?

On 12/8/06, Ben Suffolk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Hi Ganeshwair,
Are you sending a source address with your message?

I would have a look at the global-sender setting in the smsbox section of
the config file and see if you have it set to anything. This will at least
give you a default if you don't override it with any specific at the time of
submitting a message.

Failing that you might have the wrong TON set in the smpp section. So have
a look at  source-addr-ton It defaults to international, but may need to
be set to network pending on what your operator has assigned to you as the a
source number.

Regards

Ben
On 8 Dec 2006, at 03:32, Ganeshwari wrote:

Hai All,
         I have SMPP connection, using this I am trying to send sms.It was
sending SMS from the Kannel gateway to the SMSC correctly and it returning
the status 202 sent, but the message was not received.
 From the smsc log I found the following error message ,
     "SMSC returned error code 0x0000000a (Invalid Source Address) in
response to submit_sm."

 After get the SMPP connection, I have changed the smsc configuration like
this,

group = smsc
smsc = smpp
host = ***.***.***.**
port = ****
smsc-username = "xxxxxxx"
smsc-password = "*****"
system-type = ""
address-range = ""
log-file=/SMSLOGS/smsc.log
log-level=0
msg-id-type=1

Can I need to change any other group of configuration especially for SMPP
?

What could be the problem ? Please can any one help me ?



Thanks in Advance,
Ganeshwari.





--
Regards,
S.K.Ganeshwari.

Reply via email to