Hi all, A colleaque of mine encouter this interesting case: He has 2 machine running the latest kannel (compiled from source) on 2 different machines. One machine is Fedora 4 with non-branded IBM compatible CPU, the other is RHEL4 U3, with HP DL 3335.
The problem is, he insists that kannel on FC4 is three times faster in responding than on RHEL4U3. It just doesn't make sense, right? Or, is FC4 is indeed faster than RHEL4U3? Any thoughts are most welcome. Thank you, -- Fajar Priyanto | Reg'd Linux User #327841 | Linux tutorial http://linux2.arinet.org 10:22am up 1:14, 2.6.16.13-4-default GNU/Linux Let's use OpenOffice. http://www.openoffice.org
pgpWcubArEsNi.pgp
Description: PGP signature
