Couldn't you just put any number there? Your operator relies on you sending the empty field? Looks strange to me...
Kannel is plagued with checks on the sender number (it's a logical thing to do IMHO), so I don't think you'd be able to send with an empty sender without patching. Regards, Alejandro On 11/5/07, Richard Cooke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Thanks to Iain and Ismail for your answers. One more related question : > Is it possible to send a message and leave the sender blank? > > > > One of my operators\networks won't accept any sender numbers because it > uses its own, but I get a "Sender missing and no global set, rejected" > error if I leave it blank. Can I alter the source code to allow this, or > will that break the SMPP protocol? > > > > > -- Alejandro Guerrieri Magicom http://www.magicom-bcn.net/ LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/aguerrieri
