I see, so kannel isn't actually doing anything with keywords.  The keyword
matching is done by your own code.

On Nov 5, 2007 9:56 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> in case your config processes MO traffic only, your sql should do the
> regexp
> you will have insert events only
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Aaron Simmons [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 05 Ноември 2007 г.
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject:sqlbox and keywords/regex
>
> > Does anyone have an example of using sqlbox to do keyword processing?
>  I'm using sqlbox-- it has created the send_sms
> > and sent_sms tables.  I'm not clear where the keywords/regexs go-- there
> doesn't appear to be a table for it.  Perhaps I'm misunderstanding how this
> works?
>
> > On Oct 22, 2007 10:36 AM, seik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > you could set sqlbox to get all the traffic  - MO, DLR, MT in one table,
> via simple default service description.
> > so you may skip the http request step and the regexps will be performed
> on sql level.
>
> > even, in case you use postgresql , you could set rules on insert in a
> view to automate the processing according the incoming text content,
> > but but this is not a kannel related issue i believe.
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Aaron Simmons [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: 22 Октомври 2007 г.
> > To: seikath
>
> > Subject:keyword-regex and matching spaces
>
> >> What I've gathered of sqlbox is that it contains a queue table for
> >> smses to send and a table of logs and DLRs.  Does sqlbox handle
> >> keyword matching, or is that still up to the sms-service conf file
> and/or external app?
>
>
> >> On 10/21/07, seik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> well,
> >> you always could read the source from here
> >> http://www.kannel.org/~mconte/sqlbox/<http://www.kannel.org/%7Emconte/sqlbox/>
>
> >> and kannel users mailing list like this one:
>
> >> http://www.kannel.org/pipermail/users/2006-October/000859.html
>
> >> cheers
>
>
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Aaron Simmons [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> Sent: 21 Октомври 2007 г.
> >> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> Subject:keyword-regex and matching spaces
>
> >>> Where is sqlbox documented?  Is it a new feature?
>
>
> >>> On Aug 31, 2007, at 9:05 PM, seik wrote:
>
> >>>> exactly
> >>>>
> >>>> sqlbox to handle all the traffic
> >>>> ONE default service and the services routing rules are applied upon
> >>>> db insert
> >>>>
> >>>> much easier to implement any new service without touching kannel
> >>>> instance at all
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> -----Original Message-----
> >>>> From: Rodrigo Cremaschi [EMAIL PROTECTED] ]
> >>>> Sent: 31 ?????? 2007 ?.
> >>>> To: seik
> >>>> Subject:keyword-regex and matching spaces
> >>>>
> >>>>> Hello Aaron,
> >>>>
> >>>>>     This seems to be kind of a philosofical discussion, but at some
> >>>>> point in time, you will find much easier to modify a script than to
> >>>>> modify the config file and restart kannel just for a minor change.
> >>>>
> >>>>>     Best regards,
> >>>>
> >>>>> Rodrigo
> >>>>
> >>>>> On 8/31/07, Aaron Simmons < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>>>>> I've run into a problem with keyword-regexp and matching spaces.
> >>>>>> Kannel won't match spaces.  Though it doesn't appear to be
> >>>>>> documented
> >>>>>> (clearly?) in the Kannel User's Guide, its mentioned a couple
> >>>>>> times on
> >>>>>> this mailing list.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> My question is: why?  Does Kannel throw out everything past the
> >>>>>> first
> >>>>>> space and only feed the first word to the regexp engine?  I
> >>>>>> understand
> >>>>>> that the sms-service feature is designed to facilitate single-
> >>>>>> keyword
> >>>>>> matching, but still...this seems like an arbitrary limitation.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> For any kind of semi-complex patterns, the user has to send the sms
> >>>>>> off to a program that can handle regex's with spaces.  Its
> >>>>>> doable, but
> >>>>>> its a pain.  I'd rather have all of my logic in the conf file and
> >>>>>> not
> >>>>>> split between the conf file and some other scripts.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>>> aaron
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

Reply via email to