Thanks Alejandro,
Currently my Application server is running on DELL PowerEdge 6400 (with 4
Xeon 700MHz processors and 4 GB ram). Likewise Kannel is working on a 2GB
Ram Machine with P4. Hopefully it will all work fine in production as your
advice also matches the same.

My concern right now is - I am going to get bandwidth from ISP; how much
should I get (128kpbs? 256kbps? 512kpbs? or 1mbps?) so that my servers can
easily communicate with two operator's smsc operating at a max speed of
200sms/sec? I need an experienced advice as I dont want to stuck in
bottlenecks @ ISP speed side coz all others are planned well already withthe
help of opinions of experts like you.

Thanks,
Hammad

On Dec 10, 2007 9:19 PM, Alejandro Guerrieri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:

> Hammad,
>
> The main bottleneck is usually the applications, not Kannel itself.
>
> If your applications spent just a couple of seconds responding, at that
> rate messages will start to pile up, deplete your available sockets and
> finally sent your system(s) to a crawl.
>
> So, first of all, applications and gateway should be on separate servers.
>
> Depending on your application's design and load, you may consider a
> separate db server or even clustering for apps.
>
> Regarding Kannel, it's design is very efficient and nice on the CPU, so
> you won't need that dual-xeon with gazillion gigs of ram, but you should
> anyway put some decent hardware if you expect to manage hundreds of messages
> per second.
>
> I cannot give you specific specs, because there are too many variables
> that can affect the overcome, but as a rule of thumb: many cores or HT are
> always welcome, as well as memory. HD's not the main point of concern, since
> Kannel does a lot of it's stuff on memory, but if you use MySQL storage for
> DLR's or sqlbox, it may also play a role. You could use a separate DB here
> as well.
>
> As I've said before, your main point of concern is depletion of sockets
> because application's delays, so plan that part well and you'll be well on
> your path to succeed.
>
> Regards,
>
> Alejandro
>
>
> On Dec 10, 2007 12:20 PM, Khan, Hammad Aslam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Thanks Juan.
> >
> > Anyone who can also share there experience about how much dedicated
> > speed should be enough to run kannel supporting a max of 200sms/s?
> > Regards,
> > Hammad
> >
> > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> > From: "Juan Nin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: "Khan, Hammad Aslam" < [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Date: Sun, 9 Dec 2007 16:41:46 -0200
> > Subject: Re: Kannel Deployment
> > this question is not for the devel list, it's for the users one...
> >
> > anyway.. for SMPP traffic it's not the SMSC who has to connect to you
> > Kannel box
> > it's your kannel box which connects to the SMSC
> >
> > so u just NAT the traffic from you kannel box on your gateway and that's
> > it
> > (if it was the SMSC which connected to the kannel box, u could do a
> > port forwarding)
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Juan
> >
> > On Dec 9, 2007 2:33 PM, Khan, Hammad Aslam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > I know everyone who have used kannel in production here will have
> > > deployments with more or less;
> > > 1- Server running Kannel Gateway
> > > 2- Server running HTTP Services
> > >  3- A VPN Concentrator/Router/ADSL router with assigned static public
> > IP to
> > > interact with operator SMSCs
> > >
> > > I am currently setting up the above setup with ADSL Router at (3)
> > >
> > > I am stuck with misconception or what should I call it - My public IP
> > is
> > > assigned to router's external interface; and
> > > Kannel machine is now in the private network (connected to the ADSL
> > router's
> > > through a switch to which Services comp is also connected).
> > >
> > > Now,
> > > 1-how can kannel machine be visible to operator smsc? (through SMPP
> > > connection) so that operator connect with kannel at port=13000
> > -Suggested
> > > network setup?
> > > 2-How much dedicated speed is required if I connect to two operators'
> > SMSC
> > > where expected traffic is max 200sms/sec?
> > >
> > > Thanking in acticipation for resolution/suggestions.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Hammad
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > devel mailing list
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > http://www.kannel.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Alejandro Guerrieri
> Magicom
> http://www.magicom-bcn.net/
> LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/aguerrieri

Reply via email to