Thank You Stipe that cleared my view on that:)

regards
tomasz

On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 6:11 PM, Stipe Tolj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Tomasz Zieleniewski schrieb:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have the following scenario.
>>
>> Kannel is connected to SMSC through SMPP as ESME.
>> My simulator generates MO message and sends to kannel
>> the delivery_sm PDU.
>> Should Kannel send any acknowledgment to SMPP simulator to inform about 
>> message
>> delivery if registered_delivery parameter is set to 1(0x00000001)??
>> (if yes in what form?)
>> I know that in case of submit_sm with this parameter set to 1 should cause
>> to send SMSC Delivery or SME Acknowledgment in delivery_sm or data_sm PDU.
>
> Hi Tomasz,
>
> there is no "explicite" DLR from the ESME towards the SMSC, as we have in the
> other case, where the ESME sends a submit_sm PDU and sets the
> registered_delivery = 0x01 flag to indicate to the upstream SMSC that a
> corresponding DLR is requested.
>
> Here a reference from the spec:
>
> "SME Delivery Acknowledgement
>
> Despite its name, an SME Delivery Acknowledgement is not an indication that 
> the
> short message has arrived at the SME, but rather an indication from the
> recipient SME that the user has read the short message.
>
> For an MS-based SME, an SME Delivery Acknowledgement is sent when the MS user 
> or
> MS application has read the message from the SMS storage unit (e.g. SIM card).
> For a fixed SME (i.e. ESME) the circumstances in which an SME Delivery
> Acknowledgement may be sent are beyond the scope of this specification.
> Note: The SME Delivery Acknowledgement function may not be supported on all
> network types."
>
> So, the ESME _does_ acknowledge by the corresponding deliver_sm_resp PDU that
> the ESME has received the MO and will transport it accordingly to the final
> receiver.
>
> Stipe
>
> --
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
> Kölner Landstrasse 419
> 40589 Düsseldorf, NRW, Germany
>
> tolj.org system architecture      Kannel Software Foundation (KSF)
> http://www.tolj.org/              http://www.kannel.org/
>
> mailto:st_{at}_tolj.org           mailto:stolj_{at}_kannel.org
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>

Reply via email to