Alejandro Guerrieri schrieb: > Stipe, > > Yes, I'm commiting each time the code reaches "stable" state again. > Right now I'm doing work on the DBPool implementation for other DB's > and it's somewhat messy to be released. I'll probably branch the code > with an "unstable" branch so I can commit intermediat states without > breaking anything on the CVS code. > > Regarding the tarballs, yes, sounds good.
ok, will try to get a hold on the cron job. > Last but not least, what about using a numbering method and following? > There's no 1.0, 1.4.x nor any "numbered" version of sqlbox. Maybe we > should rename Martin's latest version "1.0" (or 1.4? 1.4.1? to follow > Kannel's numbering?). We can then tag the code on CVS and take advantage > of it. yep, version numbering should be a must. In fact we should keep 0.x until we have a "real" stable release we want to postulate. I'll leave the point of decision to you, since you're closer to the code ;) Stipe -- ------------------------------------------------------------------- Kölner Landstrasse 419 40589 Düsseldorf, NRW, Germany tolj.org system architecture Kannel Software Foundation (KSF) http://www.tolj.org/ http://www.kannel.org/ mailto:st_{at}_tolj.org mailto:stolj_{at}_kannel.org -------------------------------------------------------------------
