Nikos Balkanas schrieb: > I imagine that this is a different kind of animal than smsc. What was > the deal with mbunny a month ago then? > > So can we say that kannel is fully WAP 1.2 complient? (Cookies, > concatenation, etc.)
yep, it is... In fact Kannel is the WAP GW, not the MMSC part. Which means Kannel is able to transport the MMS via the underlying WTP/WDP datagram stack implemented in Kannel. Unfortunately there are some flaws in the WAP stack, at least if you consider using it in a real GSM MNO network. For a real GSM MNO network production environment I strongly suggest using the Kannel CG (carrier-grade) commercial version. Stipe -- ------------------------------------------------------------------- Kölner Landstrasse 419 40589 Düsseldorf, NRW, Germany tolj.org system architecture Kannel Software Foundation (KSF) http://www.tolj.org/ http://www.kannel.org/ mailto:st_{at}_tolj.org mailto:stolj_{at}_kannel.org -------------------------------------------------------------------
