tend to agreed for oracle .. when you call their tech support you get only standard response - check our FAQ db ...
Enver ALTIN wrote: > Hi Nikos, > > PostgreSQL was always most reliable for me, I had some post-crash data > loss experience with 3.x series that thankfully kept me away from the > mess called MySQL since then. With recent improvements after 8.2, > PostgreSQL is performing either very close to MySQL or outperforming it > in some cases. > > SQLite is probably another good choice if you don't plan scaling it up > to multiple bearerbox processes writing to the same database. > > libsdb is essentially a multiplexing database abstraction layer if I'm > not wrong; so that's probably not what you want. And please, I beg you, > don't use Oracle. Using Oracle should be made a crime against humanity > in as many countries as possible. > > -HTH > > On Thu, 2009-01-15 at 20:03 +0200, Nikos Balkanas wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I am considering using a DB for DLR storage. Up till now I was using >> internal DLRs. Of the many options supported, (Mysql, PostgresSQL, >> Oracle, LibSdb, sqlbox, sqllite) which one would you consider best >> suited for bulk SMS, in terms of performance and reliability. If you >> could also give a one liner for your choice, it would be most >> appreciated. I thing it is fair to say, that internal is the fastest >> and least reliable of all. >> >> Thanx >> Nikos >
