Please, move to users list for such discussions. Not devel. Nikos
On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 11:34 AM, jyoti <[email protected]> wrote: > Is this the solution for achiving flow control ?. i.e re-queue of message > after geting a error code. > > Regards > Jyoti Ranjan Panda > -----Original Message----- > From: Werner Coetzee [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Monday, February 02, 2009 2:36 PM > To: jyoti; [email protected] > Subject: RE: Real Windoing in kannel for smpp ? > > > > Well, in that case, your 'receiver' should send you the appropriate error > code in the command status of the response PDU. > For instance ESME_RMSGQFUL and ESME_RTHROTTLED will cause the message to be > re-queued in Kannel. > > Regards > Werner > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: jyoti [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: 02 February 2009 11:02 > To: Nikos Balkanas; [email protected] > Subject: RE: Real Windoing in kannel for smpp ? > > Hi, > What you are telling is not flow control or windowing. > > Real flow control is the concept of a receiver informing the sender that > it > can't accept any more data. > > Not that configuring statically before the process begins. > > Regards > Jyoti Ranjan Panda > > -----Original Message----- > From: Nikos Balkanas [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Monday, February 02, 2009 2:08 PM > To: jyoti; [email protected] > Subject: Re: Real Windoing in kannel for smpp ? > > > You could use throughput. > > BR, > Nikos > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "jyoti" <[email protected]> > To: "Nikos Balkanas" <[email protected]>; <[email protected]> > Sent: Monday, February 02, 2009 10:37 AM > Subject: RE: Real Windoing in kannel for smpp ? > > > > Hi, > > I want to know the solution for > > : suppose if an ESME submits messages at a rate that exceeds the > > capabilities of its peer, congestion may occur. > > The ESME will continue to top up its window of unacknowledged requests, > > keeping the SMSC under load to process these requests. > > > > By configuring Wait-ack I think we are making the process static, By > using > > congestion_state TLV we can control windowing at run time. > > > > If I am wrong please suggest. > > > > Thanks & Regards > > Jyoti Ranjan Panda > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Nikos Balkanas [mailto:[email protected]] > > Sent: Monday, February 02, 2009 1:35 PM > > To: jyoti; [email protected] > > Subject: Re: Real Windoing in kannel for smpp ? > > > > > > Hi, > > > > Please check parameters wait-ack and wait-ack-expire in User's Guide. > > > > BR, > > Nikos > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "jyoti" <[email protected]> > > To: <[email protected]> > > Sent: Monday, February 02, 2009 8:31 AM > > Subject: Real Windoing in kannel for smpp ? > > > > > >> Hi All, > >> > >> Does there any configurable parameter for windowing in smpp(i.e if I > have > >> connected to smsc through smpp)? > >> > >> Does congestion_state TLV is used in kannel for smpp? which could be > sent > >> in > >> response as parameter to provide real windowing > >> like TCP. > >> > >> Waiting for reply > >> > >> Thanks & Regards > >> Jyoti Ranjan Panda > >> > >> > > > > > > > > -- > > PLEASE CONSIDER THE ENVIRONMENT BEFORE PRINTING THIS E-MAIL. > > This e-mail message and all attachments transmitted with it are > confidential > and are intended solely for the addressee(s). If the reader of this message > is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any reading, > dissemination, distribution, copying, or other use of this message or its > attachment(s) is strictly prohibited. > > > >
