hello Kannel Users&Developers,

althrough in the change log for 1.4.1:

Bugfixes:

  * ............

  *

  * Fixed OTA compiler, within WBXML compilation.


But with libwbxml, binary data converted by libwbxml is different than by
kannel.

The binary data converted by kannel can not be decoded back to XML by
libwbxml: Error: wbxml2xml failed 'Invalid String Table Index'.

The provisioning doesn't work on my Nokia Symbian 3rd, after SMS received.


Please confirm me, if I am wrong or not.


Regards

Pai


On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 8:15 PM, Pai Peng <[email protected]> wrote:

> hello,
>
>
> i have dumped the wbxml data for a OTA-Prov XML into a binary file, which
> data is converted by ota_compiler.c.
>
> With libxbxml tool (convert wbxml back to xml) to check validity, I got
> error by wbxml2xml:
>
> ***************************
>  Converting file: output.wbxml
> (0) Parsed version: '0x1'
> (1) Parsed publicid: '0x6'
> (2) Parsed charset: '0x2F'
> (3) Parsing strtbl
>       Checking PublicID
>       PublicID token: 0x6
>       PublicID : '-//WAPFORUM//DTD SL 1.0//EN'
> (35) Parsing body
> (35) Parsing element
> (35) Parsing stag
> (36) Parsing content: '0x33'
> (36) Parsing element
> (36) Parsing stag
> (37) Parsing content: '0x34'
> (37) Parsing element
> (37) Parsing stag
> (38) Parsing content: '0x34'
> (38) Parsing element
> (38) Parsing stag
> (39) Parsing content: '0x39'
> (39) Parsing element
> (39) Parsing stag
> (40) Parsing content: '0x44'
> (40) Parsing element
> (40) Parsing stag
> (40) Parsing literalTag
> WBXML Parser failed at 41 - token: 34 (Invalid String Table Index)
> wbxml2xml convertion failed - WBXML Parser Error: Invalid String Table
> Index
> Current allocations: 0 areas, 0 bytes
> Highest number of allocations: 33 areas
> Highest memory usage: 6001 bytes
>
> I can be sure, that the wbxml2xml works corretly.
> So my question is, if the kannel's implementation of wbxml is correct or
> the compatibility protocol with libwbxml? has somebody got the same problem
> by XML to WBXML converting?
>
>
> Regards
>
> Pai
>

Reply via email to