Hi,

Just as I suspected. You restarted bearerbox before receiving the DLR. It has 
nothing to do with connection/reconnection. How is poor bearerbox going to 
guess which was the original SMS? The match is stored in memory, which you 
purged when restarting the process.

BR,
Nikos
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Elton Hoxha 
  To: Nikos Balkanas 
  Cc: Alvaro Cornejo ; kannel users 
  Sent: Saturday, March 07, 2009 4:41 PM
  Subject: Re: MO-AT delivery report non returns


  Hi,

  here are the access.log records

  2009-03-04 23:10:56 Sent SMS [SMSC:internal1] [SVC:a] [ACT:] [BINF:] 
[FID:2231470089] [from:77777] [to:355672509006] [flags:-1:0:-1:-1:31] 
[msg:121:heldsfffff
  
ffffffffffffffffffffffssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssworld]
 [udh:0:]
  2009-03-04 23:10:56 Receive DLR [SMSC:internal1] [SVC:a] [ACT:] [BINF:] 
[FID:2231470089] [from:77777] [to:355672509006] [flags:-1:-1:-1:-1:8] 
[msg:4:ACK/] [ud
  h:0:]

  Also I`m pasting the reference number of the delivery report that was pending 
in SMSC queue: 234982379117

  Attached are the bearerbox logs

  Thanks guys
  Elton


  2009/3/7 Nikos Balkanas <[email protected]>

    Hi,

    Please help me with something. Your access log says that it received the 
matching DLR (same FID, destination number) at 20:49:58, and yet you send us an 
excerpt from your bearerbox failing to match it at  20:51:22, almost 2' later? 
What happened in between? It's not even the same message, is it?

    Please post consistent access + bearerbox logs.

    BR,
    nikos


      ----- Original Message ----- 
      From: Elton Hoxha 
      To: Alvaro Cornejo 
      Cc: kannel users 
      Sent: Saturday, March 07, 2009 12:40 PM
      Subject: Re: MO-AT delivery report non returns


      Hi guys,

      I`m attching the conf file and bearerbox logs.

      Also the access.log records are:

      2009-03-04 20:49:48 Log begins
      2009-03-04 20:49:58 Sent SMS [SMSC:internal1] [SVC:a] [ACT:] [BINF:] 
[FID:2224527139] [from:77777] [to:355672509006] [flags:-1:0:-1:-1:31] 
[msg:121:heldsfffff
      
ffffffffffffffffffffffssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssworld]
 [udh:0:]
      2009-03-04 20:49:58 Receive DLR [SMSC:internal1] [SVC:a] [ACT:] [BINF:] 
[FID:2224527139] [from:77777] [to:355672509006] [flags:-1:-1:-1:-1:8] 
[msg:4:ACK/] [ud
      h:0:]


      Thanks
      Elton



      On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 10:18 PM, Alvaro Cornejo 
<[email protected]> wrote:

        Please post your complete config file and a complete log of the
        transaction send of message and the dlr transaction


        
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

        Envνe y Reciba Datos y mensajes de Texto (SMS) hacia y desde cualquier
        celular y Nextel
        en el Perϊ, Mιxico y en mas de 180 paises. Use aplicaciones 2 vias via

        SMS y GPRS online
                     Visitenos en www.perusms.NET www.smsglobal.com.mx y
        www.pravcom.com




        On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 1:49 PM, Elton Hoxha <[email protected]> wrote:
        > Hi,
        >
        >
        > while the delivery report is in the queue (after a disconnection of 
kannel
        > with SMSC) and the connection is re-established, the SMSC makes its 
own
        > retry to deliver the report to kannel, but kannel cannot handle to 
send it
        > to my application.
        >
        > 2009-03-04 12:22:06 [5885] [7] DEBUG: SMPP[internal1] handle_pdu, got 
DLR
        > 2009-03-04 12:22:06 [5885] [7] DEBUG: DLR[internal]: Looking for DLR
        > smsc=internal1, ts=2155185733, dst=355672509006, type=1
        > 2009-03-04 12:22:06 [5885] [7] WARNING: DLR[internal]: DLR from
        > SMSC<internal1> for DST<355672509006> not found.
        > 2009-03-04 12:22:06 [5885] [7] ERROR: SMPP[internal1]: got DLR but 
could not
        > find message or was not interested in it id<2155185733> 
dst<355672509006>,
        > type<1>
        >
        > I tried all the msg-id-type values, like 1, 2 3
        >
        > Thanks
        > Elton
        >




Reply via email to