I got CVS version,
and it works well

2009-05-26 12:12:12 Receive DLR [SMSC:xxx] [SVC:lkjhfld] [ACT:] [BINF:]
[FID:4294967295] [META:?smpp?dlr_err=000&] [from:test] [to:xxx]
[flags:-1:-1:-1:-1:1] [msg:93:id:090526121207989121879130 submit
date:0905261212 done date:0905261212 stat:DELIVRD err:000 ] [udh:0:]

On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 10:11 AM, Alejandro Guerrieri <
[email protected]> wrote:

> Well, firsthand, the dlr format doesn't seen to be the standard:
>
> id:090526082107989121879130 submit date:0905260821 done date:0905260821
> stat:DELIVRD err:000
>
>
> Kannel expects:
>
>
> id:%64[^s] sub:%d dlvrd:%d submit date:%14[0-9] done date:%14[0-9] 
> stat:%10[^t^e]
> err:%3[^t]
>
>
> Notice "sub" and "dlvrd" fields are missing between "id" and "submit date".
>
> Kannel should be able to handle this (perhaps there's some debug entry
> after the PDU with something like
>
> "SMPP[XXXXXX]: Couldnot parse DLR string sscanf way, fallback to old way.
> Please report!"
>
> Can you give a shot with latest CVS? It's as stable as 1.4.3 and have some
> dlr's fixups in place.
>
> Regards,
>
> Alejandro
>
> On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 6:20 AM, Sayed Hadi Rastgou Haghi <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>> thanks
>> I tested both 1.4.1, and 1.4.3 and both had same results.
>>
>> 2009-05-26 08:21:12 [10283] [6] DEBUG: SMPP[xxxx]: Got PDU:
>> 2009-05-26 08:21:12 [10283] [6] DEBUG: SMPP PDU 0x81aec50 dump:
>> 2009-05-26 08:21:12 [10283] [6] DEBUG:   type_name: deliver_sm
>> 2009-05-26 08:21:12 [10283] [6] DEBUG:   command_id: 5 = 0x00000005
>> 2009-05-26 08:21:12 [10283] [6] DEBUG:   command_status: 0 = 0x00000000
>> 2009-05-26 08:21:12 [10283] [6] DEBUG:   sequence_number: 2 = 0x00000002
>> 2009-05-26 08:21:12 [10283] [6] DEBUG:   service_type: NULL
>> 2009-05-26 08:21:12 [10283] [6] DEBUG:   source_addr_ton: 0 = 0x00000000
>> 2009-05-26 08:21:12 [10283] [6] DEBUG:   source_addr_npi: 0 = 0x00000000
>> 2009-05-26 08:21:12 [10283] [6] DEBUG:   source_addr: "xxxxx"
>> 2009-05-26 08:21:12 [10283] [6] DEBUG:   dest_addr_ton: 0 = 0x00000000
>> 2009-05-26 08:21:12 [10283] [6] DEBUG:   dest_addr_npi: 0 = 0x00000000
>> 2009-05-26 08:21:12 [10283] [6] DEBUG:   destination_addr: NULL
>> 2009-05-26 08:21:12 [10283] [6] DEBUG:   esm_class: 4 = 0x00000004
>> 2009-05-26 08:21:12 [10283] [6] DEBUG:   protocol_id: 0 = 0x00000000
>> 2009-05-26 08:21:12 [10283] [6] DEBUG:   priority_flag: 0 = 0x00000000
>> 2009-05-26 08:21:12 [10283] [6] DEBUG:   schedule_delivery_time: NULL
>> 2009-05-26 08:21:12 [10283] [6] DEBUG:   validity_period: NULL
>> 2009-05-26 08:21:12 [10283] [6] DEBUG:   registered_delivery: 0 =
>> 0x00000000
>> 2009-05-26 08:21:12 [10283] [6] DEBUG:   replace_if_present_flag: 0 =
>> 0x00000000
>> 2009-05-26 08:21:12 [10283] [6] DEBUG:   data_coding: 0 = 0x00000000
>> 2009-05-26 08:21:12 [10283] [6] DEBUG:   sm_default_msg_id: 0 = 0x00000000
>> 2009-05-26 08:21:12 [10283] [6] DEBUG:   sm_length: 93 = 0x0000005d
>> 2009-05-26 08:21:12 [10283] [6] DEBUG:   short_message:
>> 2009-05-26 08:21:12 [10283] [6] DEBUG:    Octet string at 0x81b0ad0:
>> 2009-05-26 08:21:12 [10283] [6] DEBUG:      len:  93
>> 2009-05-26 08:21:12 [10283] [6] DEBUG:      size: 94
>> 2009-05-26 08:21:12 [10283] [6] DEBUG:      immutable: 0
>> 2009-05-26 08:21:12 [10283] [6] DEBUG:      data: 69 64 3a 30 39 30 35 32
>> 36 30 38 32 31 30 37 39   id:0905260821079
>> 2009-05-26 08:21:12 [10283] [6] DEBUG:      data: 38 39 31 32 31 38 37 39
>> 31 33 30 20 73 75 62 6d   89121879130 subm
>> 2009-05-26 08:21:12 [10283] [6] DEBUG:      data: 69 74 20 64 61 74 65 3a
>> 30 39 30 35 32 36 30 38   it date:09052608
>> 2009-05-26 08:21:12 [10283] [6] DEBUG:      data: 32 31 20 64 6f 6e 65 20
>> 64 61 74 65 3a 30 39 30   21 done date:090
>> 2009-05-26 08:21:12 [10283] [6] DEBUG:      data: 35 32 36 30 38 32 31 20
>> 73 74 61 74 3a 44 45 4c   5260821 stat:DEL
>> 2009-05-26 08:21:12 [10283] [6] DEBUG:      data: 49 56 52 44 20 65 72 72
>> 3a 30 30 30 20            IVRD err:000
>> 2009-05-26 08:21:12 [10283] [6] DEBUG:    Octet string dump ends.
>> 2009-05-26 08:21:12 [10283] [6] DEBUG:   network_error_code:
>> 2009-05-26 08:21:12 [10283] [6] DEBUG:    Octet string at 0x81b0fb8:
>> 2009-05-26 08:21:12 [10283] [6] DEBUG:      len:  3
>> 2009-05-26 08:21:12 [10283] [6] DEBUG:      size: 4
>> 2009-05-26 08:21:12 [10283] [6] DEBUG:      immutable: 0
>> 2009-05-26 08:21:12 [10283] [6] DEBUG:      data: 03 00 00
>> 2009-05-26 08:21:12 [10283] [6] DEBUG:    Octet string dump ends.
>> 2009-05-26 08:21:12 [10283] [6] DEBUG:   receipted_message_id:
>> 2009-05-26 08:21:12 [10283] [6] DEBUG:    Octet string at 0x81b0f88:
>> 2009-05-26 08:21:12 [10283] [6] DEBUG:      len:  24
>> 2009-05-26 08:21:12 [10283] [6] DEBUG:      size: 25
>> 2009-05-26 08:21:12 [10283] [6] DEBUG:      immutable: 0
>> 2009-05-26 08:21:12 [10283] [6] DEBUG:      data: 30 39 30 35 32 36 30 38
>> 32 31 30 37 39 38 39 31   0905260821079891
>> 2009-05-26 08:21:12 [10283] [6] DEBUG:      data: 32 31 38 37 39 31 33
>> 30                           21879130
>> 2009-05-26 08:21:12 [10283] [6] DEBUG:    Octet string dump ends.
>> 2009-05-26 08:21:12 [10283] [6] DEBUG: SMPP PDU dump ends.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 5:59 PM, Alejandro Guerrieri <
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Sayed,
>>> Which Kannel version are you using?
>>>
>>> Also, please put log-level in 0 and paste the complete deliver_sm PDU for
>>> the DLR.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 3:29 PM, Sayed Hadi Rastgou Haghi <
>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi
>>>> In access.log
>>>> I get this
>>>>
>>>> 2009-05-25 17:13:50 Receive DLR [SMSC:xxx] [SVC:xxx] [ACT:] [BINF:]
>>>> [FID:xxx] [from:xxx] [to:xxx] [flags:-1:-1:-1:-1:*2*]
>>>> [msg:93:id:0905... submit date:0905251713 done date:0905251713 *
>>>> stat:DELIVRD* err:000 ] [udh:0:]
>>>>
>>>> as you can see, the delivery flag is set to *2* but in delivery message
>>>> you can see *stat:DELIVRD.
>>>>
>>>> *How can I cover this?
>>>> can I force kannel to parse delivery smsc report and get message status
>>>> from it?
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Sincerely,
>>>> Sayed Hadi Rastgou Haghi
>>>>
>>>> http://www.ubuntu.com
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Sincerely,
>> Sayed Hadi Rastgou Haghi
>>
>> http://www.ubuntu.com
>>
>
>


-- 
Sincerely,
Sayed Hadi Rastgou Haghi

http://www.ubuntu.com

Reply via email to