If connectivity is ok, you could try establishing more connections, assuming the carrier allows you to do that (ask them about how many simultaneous links they allow you to establish). Try cloning the smsc group you have now, to establish two simultaneous binds and see if that improves things a bit. You're not setting max-pending-submits right? (The default is 10, which should be ok).
Regards, Alejandro On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 2:49 PM, Jinson <[email protected]> wrote: > Alejandro, > > There are no throttling errors in my logs.... > > Thanks > > > > On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 6:09 PM, Alejandro Guerrieri < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> I'd first rule out throttling errors. If your smsc returns throttling >> errors, your throughput will drop drastically since messages will be retried >> and delayed. >> Also consider upgrading to latest CVS, there's a lot of improvements on >> the SMPP module regarding throughput handling. >> >> Regards, >> >> Alejandro >> >> >> On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 2:28 PM, Jinson <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> How about connecting with multiple sessions to handle the heavy MT. My >>> provider suggested me to do this. But how to do the routing?.. >>> >>> Thanks >>> Jinson >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 5:56 PM, Alejandro Guerrieri < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Yes, probably the SMSC's not accepting messages fast enough. >>>> Check on your logs to see if you're getting throttling errors, you may >>>> need to play with the throughput parameter, and maybe max-pending-submits >>>> as well. >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> >>>> Alejandro >>>> >>>> >>>> On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 2:06 PM, Jinson <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hello Users, >>>>> >>>>> I'm having 4 SMSCs configured. And one among that has a heavy sms push. >>>>> >>>>> I am routing messages by specifying SMSC parameter in url >>>>> >>>>> The problem is my messages in SMSC3 are getting queued up heavily. Is >>>>> it because of any throughput issues from the provider? >>>>> >>>>> can somebody suggest a solution for this? >>>>> >>>>> (online 7254s, rcvd 18359, sent 18359, failed 0, queued 0 msgs) >>>>> (online 71658s, rcvd 190, sent 190, failed 0, queued 0 msgs) >>>>> (online 71658s, rcvd 74893, sent 38434, failed 7, queued 50728 msgs) >>>>> (online 3795s, rcvd 0, sent 0, failed 0, queued 0 msgs) >>>>> >>>>> Thanks >>>>> Jinson >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> >
