Hi Matt,

You nailed it exactly on the head. You HAVE to get a first provider, to deliver 
his SMS. Let's say you take a provider in China. They will give you their 
subscribers. Then you approach Verizon and you tell them:

I can provide you roaming with China's chinatel. Will you provide me roaming in 
the US?

You don't need shortcodes or longcodes. You need to build a clientbase. The 
more you have, the easier it will be to get them into the bargaining table. 
Certain providers, like AT&T like to have their own services. But there are 
niche countries, like Rhodesia, that they are not interested in directly 
investing into. If you have access, you can approach them to discuss possible 
roaming possibilities.

These are fictional names, so please do not take anything for real. I am a 
technical person, not a business one. I just hope I can point you in the right 
direction. Basically you have to work with a sales/business person to close 
these agreements. This person has to find and lookup the contacts you need.

BR,
Nikos 

  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Matt Hart 
  To: [email protected] 
  Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2009 6:32 PM
  Subject: Re: kannel over using SMSC API....


        Thank you Nikos.

        Ok, this may be a little off-the-normal-topic... but,
        Is there a compiled list of contacts for carriers (in the US 
preferably) where one could start this process?  It would be instructive to use 
even one carrier as a starting point to get kannel operating towards several 
carriers eventually.

        Also, would one need a short code in hand before approaching these 
companies, or could they offer up a long code contract one could use on a 
limited basis that could be assigned for testing?  (It would be nice to try to 
do this without the use of a modem since it seems technically possible.)

        Thank you,
        Matt

        --- On Wed, 9/30/09, Nikos Balkanas <[email protected]> wrote:


          From: Nikos Balkanas <[email protected]>
          Subject: Re: kannel over using SMSC API....
          To: "Kent Walker" <[email protected]>, "Matt Hart" 
<[email protected]>, [email protected]
          Date: Wednesday, September 30, 2009, 5:01 AM


          Hi Matt,

          To do carrier routing, you will have to sign roaming agreements with 
the carriers you are interested. They usually provide an HTTP interface which 
you can access and for a small charge each time, they will return the status of 
the subscriber (absent, successful, etc.)

          BR,
          Nikos
            ----- Original Message ----- 
            From: Kent Walker 
            To: Matt Hart ; [email protected] 
            Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2009 1:02 AM
            Subject: RE: kannel over using SMSC API....


            Hi Matt,



        So, you want to send and receive messages to multiple carriers in the 
US without using an aggregator? I believe you would need to go to 
www.usshortcodes.com and reserve a short code. This would be reserved on all US 
based carriers who participate (I believe that is all of the major ones). You 
would then have to go to TMO, AT&T, Verizon, etc. and setup accounts and 
pricing and the whole deal. I am willing to bet that the pricing they give you 
as a small user will be far more expensive than what they give an aggregator. 
Never mind the fact that setting up an SMPP client at a place like TMO (trust 
me, I know) can take a long time. I still would have no idea how you would keep 
track of which carrier to send the messages. 

         

        Kent Walker

        Senior Wireless Network Engineer 


------------------------------------------------------------------------

        From: [email protected] 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Matt Hart
        Sent: Monday, September 28, 2009 9:50 PM
        To: [email protected]
        Subject: Re: kannel over using SMSC API....

         

        Thank you Kent ,

        I hope to reach as many carriers as possible.  I understand that 
aggregators and such are a service that is required and need to be paid.  I 
would like to use kannel though, and I was wondering what this buys me over 
such aggregator's APIs that they offer that allow me to directly connect to 
their services.  Do I need to do my own aggregating foot work if I wish to use 
kannel and a single short code?  What part am I missing?



        Thanks again,

        Matt




------------------------------------------------------------------------

        From: Kent Walker <[email protected]>
        To: Matt Hart <[email protected]>; [email protected]
        Sent: Wednesday, September 23, 2009 4:12:48 PM
        Subject: RE: kannel over using SMSC API....

        Hello Matt,

         

        Are the destination MSISDNs for these messages all on the same carrier 
or are they on a variety of carriers? If you are mixing and matching US 
carriers, you are paying the aggregator to send the message to the correct 
carrier. They take care of little things like local number portability so that 
you don’t have to track which MSISDN belongs to which network. 

         

        Kent Walker

        Senior Wireless Network Engineer 

        Jasper Wireless 

        501 Macara Avenue, Suite 202 

        Sunnyvale, CA  94085  USA 

        (w) 408-328-5269 

        (m) 425-233-9859 

        (f)   408-328-5201 


------------------------------------------------------------------------

        From: [email protected] 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Matt Hart
        Sent: Wednesday, September 23, 2009 12:59 PM
        To: [email protected]
        Subject: kannel over using SMSC API....

         

        Hello, 

        I have a question concerning kannel.  It's not that technical, but I've 
been reading through the list and it seems it would still be a good place to 
inquire.  I have been working towards a SMS application where I simply need to 
send quite a few messages out from a central server, pretty much all at once.  
Probably  several thousand an hour max, but not continuosly.  Then a response 
is expected back , but not mandatory.  I should say I am in the US , and all 
messaging will be within the US .  



        As I have reluctantly learned, in the US one needs a short code to do 
any sort of business like this.  Fine, so I am stuck with a $500/mo bill 
whether I send receive messsages or not.  (The corporate lobbies here have 
apparently won that battle before the public really knew what hit them.. sorry, 
I am digressing.)



        In my searching for how to go about performing this task I have found 
there's lots of folks that want to be a middle man in this business and frankly 
I can't afford to pay a middle man to do this sort of business.  This lead me 
to kannel.  I enjoy working through my linux server at home, and it seems like 
it can cut out a middle man at least to some extent - I think. If I am on 
track, then I see that one still needs a SMSC connection, that charges per SMS, 
and the short code is by law, so there's really no way around most of it.  Now, 
these commercial SMSCs have their own APIs (e..g. clickatell) to connect and 
transfer the text messages that can work fairly straight forwardly.  Personally 
I don't like giving them any more reason to exist than I have too, and very 
much like the idea of having something like kannel to chop out whatever part 
they have in this game. Utilizing my linux box is an even better plus.   My 
question is finally, what does kannel do that the commercial SMSC APIs cannot 
do for the small intities, like myself, that just want to send and receive lots 
of texts as simply (and of course cheaply) as possible?



        Sorry this is so long winded, I promise any additional replies won't be!



        -Matt

         


       

Reply via email to