Humm, strangely the exact same configuration was working with another kannel
my work had running. I suspect the syntax change came in a later stage.

Is there anyway i can know the version of kannel running?

Bibek Shrestha
-- 
bibekshrestha at gmail dot com
Blog: http://bibekshrestha.com.np
Twitter: http://twitter.com/bibstha


On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 4:57 PM, Otandeka Simon Peter <[email protected]
> wrote:

>  Hi Bibek,
>
>
>
> It is smsc-id and not smsc-ids i.e. remove the ā€œsā€.
>
>
>
> Check the user guide for more details.
>
>
>
> Peter.
>  ------------------------------
>
> *From:* [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] *On
> Behalf Of *Bibek Shrestha
> *Sent:* Thursday, January 07, 2010 2:06 PM
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Subject:* Bearerbox does not start
>
>
>
> bearerbox panics with following error.
>
>
>
> 2010-01-07 16:49:07 [8042] [0] ERROR: Group 'smsbox-route' may not contain
> field 'smsc-ids'.
>
> 2010-01-07 16:49:07 [8042] [0] ERROR: Error found on line 214 of file
> `/etc/kannel/kannel.conf'.
>
> 2010-01-07 16:49:07 [8042] [0] PANIC: Couldn't read configuration from
> `/etc/kannel/kannel.conf'
>
>
>
> Here is the smsbox-route file
>
>
>
> #smsbox routing
>
> group = smsbox-route
>
> smsbox-id = dlrbox
>
> smsc-ids = "A;B;C;D;E"
>
> #smsc-ids = "A"
>
> shortcuts = ""
>
>
>
> From the docs smsc-ids is a standard field in smsbox-route. Any compilation
> options i should take care of?
>
>
>
> Regards
>
>
> Bibek Shrestha
> --
> bibekshrestha at gmail dot com
> Blog: http://bibekshrestha.com.np
> Twitter: http://twitter.com/bibstha
>

Reply via email to