Hi Nikkos

I do have a dual cpu dual core xeon with 4GB Ram

[r...@srvcom1 ~]# dmesg | grep -i "hz"
Detected 1596.575 MHz processor.
hpet0: 3 64-bit timers, 14318180 Hz
CPU0: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU            5110  @ 1.60GHz stepping 06
CPU1: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU            5110  @ 1.60GHz stepping 06
CPU2: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU            5110  @ 1.60GHz stepping 06
CPU3: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU            5110  @ 1.60GHz stepping 06
ide: Assuming 33MHz system bus speed for PIO modes; override with idebus=xx
eth0: Broadcom NetXtreme II BCM5708 1000Base-T (B1) PCI-X 64-bit 133MHz
found at mem f8000000, IRQ 16, node addr 0015c5e7e0a1
eth1: Broadcom NetXtreme II BCM5708 1000Base-T (B1) PCI-X 64-bit 133MHz
found at mem f4000000, IRQ 16, node addr 0015c5e7e0a3


Maybe I expressed the issue wrong.

By eating cpu time I mean that even if there is no traffic MO/MT
bearerbox process uses the same amount of cpu time.

Regards

Alvaro

|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
Envíe y Reciba Datos y mensajes de Texto (SMS) hacia y desde cualquier
celular y Nextel
en el Perú, México y en mas de 180 paises. Use aplicaciones 2 vias via
SMS y GPRS online
              Visitenos en www.perusms.NET www.smsglobal.com.mx y
www.pravcom.com



2010/3/26 Nikos Balkanas <[email protected]>:
> Well, if you had a store filesystem problem, you would get waiting I/O CPU
> in your top, which you don't. You can verify with:
>
> iostat 1 10
>
> Anyway, why do you say that 8% CPU is excessive? It seems normal to me. How
> much did it use to be? What is your CPU hardware?
>
> BR,
> Nikos
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Alvaro Cornejo"
> <[email protected]>
> To: <[email protected]>
> Cc: "users" <[email protected]>
> Sent: Friday, March 26, 2010 4:43 AM
> Subject: Re: bearebox eating cpu time
>
>
> I monitor kannel queue in order to manage the amount of kannel queued
> messages and be able to loadbalance the messages from different
> customers. Therefore I never have more that 1000 messages in kannel
> queue. Usually arround 400. I do have a pool of modems so that is
> aprox a 5 min queue.
>
> Therefore I don't think the problem comes from there.
>
> Any other idea?
>
> Thanks
>
> Alvaro
>
>
> |-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
> Envνe y Reciba Datos y mensajes de Texto (SMS) hacia y desde cualquier
> celular y Nextel
> en el Perϊ, Mιxico y en mas de 180 paises. Use aplicaciones 2 vias via
> SMS y GPRS online
>             Visitenos en www.perusms.NET www.smsglobal.com.mx y
> www.pravcom.com
>
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 9:57 PM,  <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> You get the dubious benefit of losing your store if the server crashes ;)
>>
>> However, if you're using ext3 for the store and it grows too big, this is
>> known to cause io problems which could result into high load. Using a
>> separate ext2 partition for the store is actually a very good idea, though
>> I'd check the rest of the setup for other possible bottlenecks as well.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Alex
>>
>> BlackBerry de movistar, allν donde estιs estα tu oficin@
>>
>> ________________________________
>> From: Alvaro Cornejo <[email protected]>
>> Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 21:37:39 -0400
>> To: Benaiad<[email protected]>
>> Cc: users<[email protected]>
>> Subject: Re: bearebox eating cpu time
>> Hi Benaiad
>>
>> I don't get it. Why should I use ramdisk for MT?
>>
>> Do you mean move kannel to run from the ramdisk? What advantage might I
>> get
>> if the rest of the information (mysql) and my app is still running from
>> HD?
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> Alvaro
>>
>>
>>
>> |-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
>> Envνe y Reciba Datos y mensajes de Texto (SMS) hacia y desde cualquier
>> celular y Nextel
>> en el Perϊ, Mιxico y en mas de 180 paises. Use aplicaciones 2 vias via SMS
>> y
>> GPRS online
>> Visitenos en www.perusms.NET www.smsglobal.com.mx y
>> www.pravcom.com
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 9:05 PM, Benaiad <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Alvaro,
>>> I suggest you to try ramdisk for MT files.
>>> Regards.
>>> --
>>> Benaiad
>>
>
>

Reply via email to