Hi,

Thanks for quick reply.. I use Kannel ver. 1.4.3.

-thomas

On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 11:59 AM, Alejandro Guerrieri <
[email protected]> wrote:

> Hrm, this is nonsense:
>
> 2010-05-04 14:35:42 [20961] [7] DEBUG: Optional parameter tag (0x0424)
> 2010-05-04 14:35:42 [20961] [7] DEBUG: Optional parameter length read
> as 8
> 2010-05-04 14:35:42 [20961] [7] ERROR: SMPP: Optional field
> (message_payload) with invalid length (8) (should be 0 - 65536)
> dropped.
>
> I mean, afaik, 0 < 8 < 65536 ;)
>
> message_payload is "optional" but kannel recognizes it and use it
> internally when it needs to.
>
> What version of kannel are you using?
>
> Have you defined any optional parameters in your configuration?
>
> Regards,
>
> Alex
>
> On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 12:42 PM, Thomas Hansen <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I get this error when routing messages to a Kannel VAS from Comverse
>> SMSC via SMPP 3.4.
>>
>> This Error ocurrs when the message is larger then 160 Characters.
>>
>> Does Kannel support Messages containing charakters like “ðáéý” incoming?
>>
>>
>> Any suggestion how to solve this?
>> Thanks in advance.
>>
>>
>> Debug from Kannel.
>>
>> 2010-05-04 14:35:42 [20961] [7] DEBUG: Optional parameter tag (0x0204)
>> 2010-05-04 14:35:42 [20961] [7] DEBUG: Optional parameter length read
>> as 2
>> 2010-05-04 14:35:42 [20961] [7] DEBUG: Optional parameter tag (0x1401)
>> 2010-05-04 14:35:42 [20961] [7] DEBUG: Optional parameter length read
>> as 13
>> 2010-05-04 14:35:42 [20961] [7] WARNING: SMPP: Unknown
>> TLV(0x1401,0x000d,31303035303431343336333700) for PDU type
>> (deliver_sm) received!
>> 2010-05-04 14:35:42 [20961] [7] DEBUG: Optional parameter tag (0x0424)
>> 2010-05-04 14:35:42 [20961] [7] DEBUG: Optional parameter length read
>> as 8
>> 2010-05-04 14:35:42 [20961] [7] ERROR: SMPP: Optional field
>> (message_payload) with invalid length (8) (should be 0 - 65536)
>> dropped.
>> 2010-05-04 14:35:42 [20961] [7] DEBUG: SMPP[ft-smsc01]: Got PDU:
>> 2010-05-04 14:35:42 [20961] [7] DEBUG: SMPP PDU 0x86323d0 dump:
>> 2010-05-04 14:35:42 [20961] [7] DEBUG:   type_name: deliver_sm
>> 2010-05-04 14:35:42 [20961] [7] DEBUG:   command_id: 5 = 0x00000005
>> 2010-05-04 14:35:42 [20961] [7] DEBUG:   command_status: 0 =
>> 0x00000000
>> 2010-05-04 14:35:42 [20961] [7] DEBUG:   sequence_number: 152 =
>> 0x00000098
>> 2010-05-04 14:35:42 [20961] [7] DEBUG:   service_type: NULL
>> 2010-05-04 14:35:42 [20961] [7] DEBUG:   source_addr_ton: 1 =
>> 0x00000001
>> 2010-05-04 14:35:42 [20961] [7] DEBUG:   source_addr_npi: 1 =
>> 0x00000001
>> 2010-05-04 14:35:42 [20961] [7] DEBUG:   source_addr: "298243390"
>> 2010-05-04 14:35:42 [20961] [7] DEBUG:   dest_addr_ton: 1 = 0x00000001
>> 2010-05-04 14:35:42 [20961] [7] DEBUG:   dest_addr_npi: 1 = 0x00000001
>> 2010-05-04 14:35:42 [20961] [7] DEBUG:   destination_addr: "298220039"
>> 2010-05-04 14:35:42 [20961] [7] DEBUG:   esm_class: 0 = 0x00000000
>> 2010-05-04 14:35:42 [20961] [7] DEBUG:   protocol_id: 0 = 0x00000000
>> 2010-05-04 14:35:42 [20961] [7] DEBUG:   priority_flag: 0 = 0x00000000
>> 2010-05-04 14:35:42 [20961] [7] DEBUG:   schedule_delivery_time: NULL
>> 2010-05-04 14:35:42 [20961] [7] DEBUG:   validity_period: NULL
>> 2010-05-04 14:35:42 [20961] [7] DEBUG:   registered_delivery: 0 =
>> 0x00000000
>> 2010-05-04 14:35:42 [20961] [7] DEBUG:   replace_if_present_flag: 0 =
>> 0x00000000
>> 2010-05-04 14:35:42 [20961] [7] DEBUG:   data_coding: 8 = 0x00000008
>> 2010-05-04 14:35:42 [20961] [7] DEBUG:   sm_default_msg_id: 0 =
>> 0x00000000
>> 2010-05-04 14:35:42 [20961] [7] DEBUG:   sm_length: 0 = 0x00000000
>> 2010-05-04 14:35:42 [20961] [7] DEBUG:   short_message: ""
>> 2010-05-04 14:35:42 [20961] [7] DEBUG:   user_message_reference: 192 =
>> 0x000000c0
>> 2010-05-04 14:35:42 [20961] [7] DEBUG: SMPP PDU dump ends.
>> 2010-05-04 14:35:42 [20961] [7] DEBUG: SMPP[ft-smsc01]: Sending PDU:
>> 2010-05-04 14:35:42 [20961] [7] DEBUG: SMPP PDU 0x8630db0 dump:
>> 2010-05-04 14:35:42 [20961] [7] DEBUG:   type_name: deliver_sm_resp
>> 2010-05-04 14:35:42 [20961] [7] DEBUG:   command_id: 2147483653 =
>> 0x80000005
>> 2010-05-04 14:35:42 [20961] [7] DEBUG:   command_status: 0 =
>> 0x00000000
>> 2010-05-04 14:35:42 [20961] [7] DEBUG:   sequence_number: 152 =
>> 0x00000098
>> 2010-05-04 14:35:42 [20961] [7] DEBUG:   message_id: NULL
>> 2010-05-04 14:35:42 [20961] [7] DEBUG: SMPP PDU dump ends.
>> 2010-05-04 14:35:51 [20961] [7] DEBUG: SMPP[ft-smsc01]: Sending
>> enquire link:
>> 2010-05-04 14:35:51 [20961] [7] DEBUG: SMPP PDU 0x8630db0 dump:
>> 2010-05-04 14:35:51 [20961] [7] DEBUG:   type_name: enquire_link
>> 2010-05-04 14:35:51 [20961] [7] DEBUG:   command_id: 21 = 0x00000015
>> 2010-05-04 14:35:51 [20961] [7] DEBUG:   command_status: 0 =
>> 0x00000000
>> 2010-05-04 14:35:51 [20961] [7] DEBUG:   sequence_number: 33 =
>> 0x00000021
>> 2010-05-04 14:35:51 [20961] [7] DEBUG: SMPP PDU dump ends.
>> 2010-05-04 14:35:51 [20961] [7] DEBUG: SMPP[ft-smsc01]: Got PDU:
>> 2010-05-04 14:35:51 [20961] [7] DEBUG: SMPP PDU 0x8630db0 dump:
>> 2010-05-04 14:35:51 [20961] [7] DEBUG:   type_name: enquire_link_resp
>> 2010-05-04 14:35:51 [20961] [7] DEBUG:   command_id: 2147483669 =
>> 0x80000015
>> 2010-05-04 14:35:51 [20961] [7] DEBUG:   command_status: 0 =
>> 0x00000000
>> 2010-05-04 14:35:51 [20961] [7] DEBUG:   sequence_number: 33 =
>> 0x00000021
>> 2010-05-04 14:35:51 [20961] [7] DEBUG: SMPP PDU dump ends.
>>
>
>

Reply via email to