Hi all, This could be an irrelevant detail, but just wanted to know if there is a reason that the "size" is different in the two cases below. I am guessing the padding is different?
Incoming TLV (IN DLR deliver_sm PDU): 2010-06-08 12:21:35 [6192] [8] DEBUG: Octet string at 0x2aaaaae02500: 2010-06-08 12:21:35 [6192] [8] DEBUG: len: 36 2010-06-08 12:21:35 [6192] [8] DEBUG: size: 37 2010-06-08 12:21:35 [6192] [8] DEBUG: immutable: 0 2010-06-08 12:21:35 [6192] [8] DEBUG: data: 37 79 51 77 4c 69 4f 5a 79 43 6b 41 41 42 38 41 7yQwLiOZyCkAAB8A 2010-06-08 12:21:35 [6192] [8] DEBUG: data: 73 49 6b 70 41 52 62 4e 6f 5a 6b 58 74 47 35 4d sIkpARbNoZkXtG5M 2010-06-08 12:21:35 [6192] [8] DEBUG: data: 75 2b 59 24 u+Y$ 2010-06-08 12:21:35 [6192] [8] DEBUG: Octet string dump ends. Outgoing TLV (in submit_sm PDU) 2010-06-08 12:28:16 [6192] [8] DEBUG: Octet string at 0x2aaaaae02260: 2010-06-08 12:28:16 [6192] [8] DEBUG: len: 36 2010-06-08 12:28:16 [6192] [8] DEBUG: size: 41 2010-06-08 12:28:16 [6192] [8] DEBUG: immutable: 0 2010-06-08 12:28:16 [6192] [8] DEBUG: data: 37 79 51 77 4c 69 4f 5a 79 43 6b 41 41 42 38 41 7yQwLiOZyCkAAB8A 2010-06-08 12:28:16 [6192] [8] DEBUG: data: 73 49 6b 70 41 52 62 4e 6f 5a 6b 58 74 47 35 4d sIkpARbNoZkXtG5M 2010-06-08 12:28:16 [6192] [8] DEBUG: data: 75 2b 59 24 u+Y$ 2010-06-08 12:28:16 [6192] [8] DEBUG: Octet string dump ends. -- Kyriacos Sakkas Development Team Netsmart Tel: + 357 22 452565 Fax: + 357 22 452566 Email: [email protected] http://www.netsmart.com.cy Taking Business to a New Level! ** Confidentiality Notice: The information contained in this email message may be privileged, confidential and protected from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient, any dissemination, distribution, or copying of this email message is strictly prohibited. If you think that you have received this email message in error, please email the sender at [email protected] **
