http://packages.ubuntu.com/lucid/net/

kannel (1.4.3-0ubuntu2) [universe]
    WAP and SMS gateway
kannel-docs (1.4.3-0ubuntu2) [universe]
    WAP and SMS gateway documentation
kannel-extras (1.4.3-0ubuntu2) [universe]
    WAP and SMS gateway extras
kannel-sqlbox (0.7.2-2) [universe]


On 07/27/2010 02:21 PM, brett skinner wrote:
> Hi
> 
> I would prefer to not have to compile but to get the package. Is what I
> have done look correct?
> 
> On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 1:17 PM, seikath <[email protected]
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> 
>     its better to compile the cvs version for sure.
> 
>     http://kannel.org/download.shtml
> 
> 
> 
>     On 07/27/2010 02:11 PM, brett skinner wrote:
>     > Hi
>     >
>     > This might not be the best place to ask this question. If it isn't
>     then
>     > please just let me know. During testing I used Ubuntu 10.4 (Lucid
>     Lynx).
>     > Our production servers are running Ubuntu Server 8.04 (Hardy
>     Heron). It
>     > appears that the version of Kannel that comes with that version of
>     > Ubuntu is 1.4.1. I am trying to upgrade just Kannel to 1.4.3.
>     >
>     > Firstly will Kannel 1.4.3 work on Ubuntu Server 8.04?
>     > Secondly if it will how can I upgrade to the correct version?
>     >
>     > On the Kannel website it said that I should add the following if I
>     > wanted the stable release (called woody?)
>     >
>     > # /For Woody/stable/
>     > deb http://www.litux.org/debian woody/
>     >
>     > I only want the binaries not the source so i left deb-src out. Now
>     when
>     > i do an apt-get update there is this failure:
>     > *W: Failed to fetch http://www.litux.org/debian/woody/Packages.gz  404
>     > Not Found*
>     > *
>     > *
>     > Have I done something incorrectly here?
>     >
>     > I then looked in the Userguide which suggested all I had to was
>     get hold
>     > of the .deb file. I cannot find a download link on the Kannel
>     downloads
>     > page for kannel-1.4.3.deb. I can see for 1.4.1.
>     >
>     > I apologize if I am missing the obvious and have wasted your time.
>     >
>     > Regards,
> 
> 

Reply via email to