Hi,
Server was 64bit Ubuntu system, kernel 2.6.31-22. Dual core Xeon @3.4GHz. 4
GB RAM. MyIsam Mysql, with index on ts,smsc. You may have to adjust this if
using latest svn with EMI or CIMD2 connections. Interestingly, SQLbox,
performed the same as smsbox in MT with DB for DLRs.
BR,
Nikos
----- Original Message -----
From: brett skinner
To: Nikos Balkanas
Cc: [email protected] ; kannel users
Sent: Monday, August 09, 2010 5:42 PM
Subject: Re: Kannel performance benchmarking
Hi Nikos
Out of curiosity can you go into more detail regarding what hardware you
were running and your setup for MySql? Were you using Innodb or MyIsam. If
you were using Innodb did you make any other configuration changes to MySql
to accommodate Innodb.
From the user guide it is implied that the bottle neck for Kannel is the
number of messages that the SMSC can accommodate per second. Is this still
the case?
Regards,
2010/8/8 Nikos Balkanas <[email protected]>
Hi,
I have run some benchmarking for a client using fakesmpp. Using the default
service for MO's I got:
MO's: 1400 SMS/s
MT + DLRs (internal): 747 SMS/s
MT + DLRs (MySql): 434 SMS/s
BR,
Nikos
----- Original Message ----- From: [email protected]
To: kannel users
Sent: Sunday, August 08, 2010 4:22 PM
Subject: Kannel performance benchmarking
Hi,
I am interested to know about the kannel performance benchmarking,
especially in terms of speed (msgs/sec), MO or MT. I assume that multiple
smsboxes does not have any effect over kannel performance, since the
front-end talking to SMSC is the main bearerbox. What is the max speed that
could be attained by kannel and/or bearerbox?
Regards,
Hamza
