Title: Re: SMSC Rejected DLR shouldn't be saved in the DLR storage
Hello Mohammed,

it is so you can find out there was an ERROR submitting the SM. How else would you know? Think of it as error message. Kannel must match it in the dlr mechanism or else you would not be able to retrieve the status of said failed SM. Think of the record as an error message.

If you don't want these, exclude 16 from your dlr mask.

BTW. i have a feeling this does not belong on the developer list, but on users.

Friday, November 19, 2010, 2:24:18 AM, you wrote:


I user dlr-mask = 31 ( kannel stable release 64-bits 1.4.3)

Hello people, thanks so much for your great answers, but my problem is not with understanding the DLR mechanism in Kannel, I already know that, but my question is: Why kannel stores DLRs in the DLR table for the SMS-Rejected MTs (status = 16)? When the SMSC rejects an MT then it will forget about it and it won't send any DLR for for that MT in the future, so Kannel shouldn't insert a record into the DLR table? right?


-- 
Best regards,
 Thomas                            mailto:[email protected]

Reply via email to