well, i need this functionality, so i will have to refresh my c skills,
last coded in c about 8 years ago :-) anyway thanks for making it clear
:-) as you know the code and app well, maybe you could suggest the best
way that would be compatible with kannel.

miroslav

Dne 7.12.2010 02:22, Nikos Balkanas napsal(a):
> Nope. Sqlbox is not part of kannel main tree. No special code has been
> written in kannel for sqlbox compatibility. You will have to change
> sources for that, however you will branch off, making future updates
> difficult.
>
> UG, is pretty clear. If you cannot distinguish traffic based on SMSc
> or shortcode, you are out of luck.
>
> BR,
> Nikos
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Miroslav Sulc"
> <[email protected]>
> To: "Nikos Balkanas" <[email protected]>
> Cc: <[email protected]>
> Sent: Tuesday, December 07, 2010 2:35 AM
> Subject: Re: routing dlrs to original boxes
>
>
>> hi,
>>
>> that i understand, but my situation is that there will be only one smsc
>> for both sqlboxes. each sqlbox will run over different database. so if
>> sqlbox1 sends message via bearerbox, i need the dlr to come back to
>> sqlbox1 to update message status in that database. the same applies for
>> sqlbox2.
>>
>> looking at dlr record, it has boxc field which seems is designated for
>> storing id of box from which the original message arrived. my
>> understanding was that if i send message from sqlbox1 to bearerbox and
>> configure somehow bearerbox to store originating box id in boxc field,
>> then when bearerbox would receive dlr from smsc, it would look at dlr,
>> would see that boxc contains sqlbox1 so would route it to sqlbox1. but i
>> am probably wrong.
>>
>> miroslav
>>
>> Dne 7.12.2010 00:42, Nikos Balkanas napsal(a):
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Your question was about routing between 2 sqlboxes. For the purposes
>>> of this discussion, you should consider each sqlbox as another smsbox.
>>> Therefore sqlbox-id should be the smsbox-id in your smsbox-route rule.
>>>
>>> You can try to push from each sqlbox to a different SMSc. This way all
>>> dlrs arriving from a given SMSc can be safely routed back to the
>>> correct sqlbox.
>>>
>>> BR,
>>> Nikos
>>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Miroslav Sulc"
>>> <[email protected]>
>>> To: "Nikos Balkanas" <[email protected]>
>>> Cc: <[email protected]>
>>> Sent: Tuesday, December 07, 2010 12:24 AM
>>> Subject: Re: routing dlrs to original boxes
>>>
>>>
>>>> i did several times, but i must miss something. according to ug, there
>>>> are these settings:
>>>>
>>>> smsbox-id - this is the id i want to route to, so if i understand
>>>> correctly, i would have to use for each box separate rule and name the
>>>> box here
>>>> smsc-id - id of smsc, in my case i have only one smsc, so i have no
>>>> other option than to use the only name of the smsc or do not specify
>>>> this at all
>>>> shortcode - this is for receiver numbers, but i can have the same
>>>> receiver numbers using different smsboxes (like the same user sending
>>>> messages both through sqlbox and smsbox), so this cannot help me at
>>>> all
>>>>
>>>> if receiver number is the same as destination number of message,
>>>> then it
>>>> seems to me it is not possible to route the messages the way i
>>>> need. am
>>>> i right?
>>>>
>>>> miroslav
>>>>
>>>> Dne 6.12.2010 22:24, Nikos Balkanas napsal(a):
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> Please read UG about smsbox-route.
>>>>>
>>>>> BR,
>>>>> Nikos
>>>>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Miroslav Sulc"
>>>>> <[email protected]>
>>>>> To: <[email protected]>
>>>>> Sent: Monday, December 06, 2010 12:44 PM
>>>>> Subject: routing dlrs to original boxes
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> hello,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> is it possible to route dlrs always to the box where the original
>>>>>> message came from? i would like to run bearerbox with two sqlboxes,
>>>>>> each
>>>>>> running over different database. and to update status of the
>>>>>> messages in
>>>>>> the databases, i need to receive the dlrs at the same database from
>>>>>> which the original message came. i read the documentation several
>>>>>> times
>>>>>> and googled too, but i did not find how to do this.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> thanks for any help.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> miroslav
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>>>
>
>

Reply via email to