It means that Kannel doesn't have the ability to re-assemble messages using the sar method. I'm not sure about how extensively used is this method among the carriers, I so far only encountered one case.
Regards, Alex On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 11:08 AM, brett skinner <[email protected]>wrote: > Do you mean as far as Kannel is concerned or that most SMSC don't use this > method? > So I did understand the spec correctly. It is just that everyone chooses to > use the UDH method rather? > > On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 11:51 AM, Alejandro Guerrieri < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> It's not implemented afaik. Only the UDH method is supported. >> >> Regards, >> >> Alex >> >> >> On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 10:47 AM, brett skinner < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Hi guys. >>> >>> Does anyone have an ideas to my question below? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 11:35 AM, brett skinner < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi >>>> >>>> I was looking through the logs and saw that Kannel sends concatenated >>>> SMSs using UDH in the Short Message fields. From reading the SMPP spec I >>>> was >>>> under the impression that the same thing could be achieved by using >>>> sar_total_segments and sar_segment_seqnum. Did I misinterpret the spec or >>>> does Kannel not use these fields for another reason such as >>>> unreliable implementation on the receiving SMSC. >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> >>> >>> >> >
