Hi Deborah,
No one has used these tools or knows about them. Testing the (kannel) http
server is straightforward:
telnet 127.0.0.1 <port>
GET / HTTP/1.0
I can't help you about test_ppg, I am using my own ppg tools for that.
With regards to your questions:
(2)
+-----------+ 1 +-------------------------+ 2
+-----------+ 3 +-----------------------+
| test_ppg | ----> | WAP Push App | ----> |
Smsbox | ----> | test_http_server |
+-----------+ | running on Wapbox |
+-----------+ +-----------------------+
+-------------------------+
This is wrong. There can be no connection between wapbox and smsbox like
that. PPG works like that:
PPG -> Wapbox -> Bearerbox -> mobile or FakeSMSc -> response (DLR) ->
Bearerbox -> smsbox -> DLR http server (dlr_url).
Read the architecture document about it.
(3) group smsc is part of bearerbox. These are the communication drivers
that bb uses for the different SMSc types. Some of them are SMPP, others
EMI, AT (modem) or HTTP. HTTP smsc can also be used internally by kannel for
relay MT routing to another kannel box. It can be used also for MO to MT
rerouting. Read UG about them.
BR,
Nikos
----- Original Message -----
From: Deborah Pisani
To: [email protected]
Sent: Monday, May 09, 2011 3:09 PM
Subject: test_ppg
Hello,
May someone please clarify:
(1) Which Kannel functions are involved when testing WAP Push using
test_ppg?
(2) Is our understanding as illustrated below correct? To our
understanding, unless we are missing something, “Bearerbox” does not play a
role here.
(3) Also, at what step (1, 2 or 3) does the group = smsc (http) get
involved?
+-----------+ 1 +-------------------------+ 2
+-----------+ 3 +-----------------------+
| test_ppg| ----> | WAP Push App | ----> | Smsbox
----> | test_http_server |
+-----------+ | running on Wapbox |
+-----------+ +-----------------------+
+-------------------------+
Best Regards,
Deborah and Andrew
