Look for smsc2_rout() in gw/bb_smscconn.c. == Rene
-----Original Message----- From: Garth Patil [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, 27 May, 2011 05:33 To: Rene Kluwen Cc: Juan Nin; Users mailing list Subject: Re: Behavior of multiple binds with the same smsc-id Thanks Rene. Can you point me to the part of the code that does this? On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 2:02 PM, Rene Kluwen <[email protected]> wrote: > Yes, it will load balance. > But as far as I recall, not in a round robin fashion. > > Messages will be sent to the smsc with the least messages in queue. Which > will always be the first one, if load is low. > > == Rene > > >> It will load balance. >> >> I believe it does it on a round robin fashion >> >> >> On Thursday, May 26, 2011, Garth Patil <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Hi All, >>> I have a question I was unable to reconcile from the documentation >>> regarding the behavior of multiple binds with the same smsc-id. I have >>> 2 pairs of TX an RX binds, with each pair connected to different data >>> centers of the same operator. If I assign the same smsc-id to all 4 >>> binds, what is the behavior of kannel when I send an SMS that >>> specifies that smsc-id? Does it choose one of the TX binds at random, >>> or load balance between the two? >>> Thanks, >>> Garth >>> >>> >> >> >> > >
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
