But if they are not ACK'ed by the receiving box, wont they try again later?

James

On Sat, May 28, 2011 at 8:52 PM, Rene Kluwen <[email protected]> wrote:

> DLR's won't get retried. Or otherwise you would need a delivery report of a
> delivery report... And so on...
>
> -- Rene...
>
>
> ------------------------------
> Van: JAmes <[email protected]>
> Verzonden: zaterdag 28 mei 2011 14:34
> Aan: [email protected]
> Onderwerp: Delivery Reports Help
>
>
> Hi,
>
> Just trying to understand the DLR system in kannel a bit better.
>
> when bearerbox received a DLR, it sends to SQLBOX, and SQLBOX puts it in
> the DB.
>
> In this case, SQLBOX didn't send an ACK (I made it do this on purpose to
> test retry method). But to me it looks like BB has deleted the DLR. Is this
> true? Is the DLR now lost? If not, when does it resend?
>
> I sent another SMS shortly after this with the SQLBOX replying with an ACK,
> and that sms worked fine, but the previous DLR still has not come through.
>
> 2011-05-28 22:16:21 [8601] [8] DEBUG: removing DLR from database
> *2011-05-28 22:16:21 [8601] [8] DEBUG: sql: DELETE FROM `tmp_kannel_dlr`
> WHERE `smsc`=? AND `timestamp`=?  LIMIT 1*
> 2011-05-28 22:16:21 [8601] [8] DEBUG: new group created `smpp'
> 2011-05-28 22:16:21 [8601] [8] DEBUG: group=`smpp' key=`dlr_err'
> value=`000'
> 2011-05-28 22:16:21 [8601] [8] DEBUG: SMPP[smsc_1_2]: Sending PDU:
> 2011-05-28 22:16:21 [8601] [8] DEBUG: SMPP PDU 0x61552f0 dump:
> *2011-05-28 22:16:21 [8601] [17] DEBUG: send_msg: sending msg to boxc:
> <dlrbox>
> *2011-05-28 22:16:21 [8601] [8] DEBUG:   type_name: deliver_sm_resp
> 2011-05-28 22:16:21 [8601] [8] DEBUG:   command_id: 2147483653 = 0x80000005
> 2011-05-28 22:16:21 [8601] [8] DEBUG:   command_status: 0 = 0x00000000
> 2011-05-28 22:16:21 [8601] [8] DEBUG:   sequence_number: 6 = 0x00000006
> 2011-05-28 22:16:21 [8601] [8] DEBUG:   message_id: NULL
> 2011-05-28 22:16:21 [8601] [8] DEBUG: SMPP PDU dump ends.
> *2011-05-28 22:16:21 [8601] [17] DEBUG: boxc_sender: sent message to
> <127.0.0.1>*
> *
> *
> *Regards,*
> *J*
>

Reply via email to