On Mon, 2011-08-29 at 12:30, Wendy William wrote: > I'am using Yahoo webmail and .... ofcourse not only me use Yahoo webmail :)
Then you should complain to the Yahoo and not this list. If all the people of the world use improper Yahoo mail (or any other) software for mailing list which cannot handle such simple option, that will not make it proper. It does not work. Period. But, this question is discussed many times in this list and I think we should terminate this useless thread. :) > Regards, Wendy > > > ----- Original Message ---- > > From: Milan P. Stanic <[email protected]> > > To: [email protected] > > Sent: Sun, August 28, 2011 9:14:21 PM > > Subject: Re: Wrong setting on Kannel Mailing List? > > > > On Sun, 2011-08-28 at 15:14, Wendy William wrote: > > > I got this complain :) > > > > > > -------------------------- > > > > Next time, always copy the users list. > > > > > > > > > > > == Rene > > > -------------------------- > > > Current Kannel mailing settings caused: > > > 1. I got 2 emails for SAME EMAIL !!! 1 from Rene and 1 form kannel.org > > > 2. I must click Replay to All, because klik to Reply only send to Rene > > > 3. Wasting time, wasting bandwidth > > > 4. How do I filter mail from Rene to be deleted because I have got same > >email > > > > > from kannel behind Rene (also other users) ? > > > > > > So, I hope the moderator change the mailing list setting to avoid this > >complain, > > > > > please ... > > > > It would be better to use e-mail client which know how to reply to > > mailing list. And not only you but most of the people subscribed to > > this list. > > > > > Regards, Wendy > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ---- > > > > From: Milan P. Stanic <[email protected]> > > > > To: [email protected] > > > > Sent: Mon, August 22, 2011 3:00:19 PM > > > > Subject: Re: Wrong setting on Kannel Mailing List? > > > > > > > > Hi Juan, > > > > > > > > On Sun, 2011-08-21 at 20:02, Juan Nin wrote: > > > > > Milan, I don't take it as an offense at all, not sure what you > > > > > understood with my reply, but it was not directed to you at all, was > > > > > directed to Wendy the original poster :) > > > > > > > > Sorry for my bad English. > > > > > > > > I didn't want to say that you offended me. I put <no offense> tag to > > > > tell that I don't want to offend you. :) > > > > > > > > > On 8/21/11 3:55 PM, Milan P. Stanic wrote: > > > > > >On Sun, 2011-08-21 at 11:08, Juan Nin wrote: > > > > > >>The "good" or "not good" depends on each person... > > > > > >Well, yes. There is "proper" also. > > > > > > > > > > > >>There's always debate on this topic on every mailing-list, where > > > > > >>some people claim one way is the "correct" or "better" one, and > some > > > > > >>people claim it's the other one, and each of them have their good > > > > > >>reasons... Search on google and you'll find tons of topics on this > > > > > >>matter, and you will be able to see the different opinions about > it. > > > > > ><no offense> > > > > > >I'm subscribed to different mailing lists for more than fifteen > > > > > >years > > > > > >and I don't have to search google about that subject, IMHO. > > > > > ></no offense> > > > > > > > > > > > >>At the end of the day, it's the decision of the list owners, and > I'm > > > > > >>sure that they have already thought about this and that they won't > > > > > >>change their mind. :) > > > > > >Agreed. But, when some random user ask how to reply "canonical > > > > > >way" I > > > > > >don't think it is rude to tell about "reply to list" option if MUA > > > > > >support that. > > > > > > > > > > > >>Regards. > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >>On 8/21/11 7:54 AM, Milan P. Stanic wrote: > > > > > >>>On Sun, 2011-08-21 at 18:10, Wendy William wrote: > > > > > >>>>When I do reply any Kannel mail then "To" field filled by > > > sender, > >not > > > > > by > > > > > >>>>[email protected]. This is not good since we must use Reply All > > > > > >>>>that > > > > > >caused > > > > > >>>>double messages. > > > > > >>>Check your e-mail client software and see if it have "reply to > >list" > > > > > (or > > > > > >>>something similar) option. > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>>Kannel mailing lists works quite well with "normal" e-mail > clients. > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Kind regards, Milan > > > > -------------------------------------------------- > > > > Arvanta, IT Security http://www.arvanta.net > > > > Please do not send me e-mail containing HTML code. > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Kind regards, Milan > > -------------------------------------------------- > > Arvanta, IT Security http://www.arvanta.net > > Please do not send me e-mail containing HTML code. > > > > -- Kind regards, Milan -------------------------------------------------- Arvanta, IT Security http://www.arvanta.net Please do not send me e-mail containing HTML code.
