On Tue, 2011-09-13 at 20:48, Alejandro Guerrieri wrote:
> SMPP's registered_delivery and the dlr-mask parameters are not correlated at
> all. Setting 5 in dlr-mask won't send a 5 to the carrier, but a 1.
> 
> Keep in mind that Kannel's parameters are usually an abstraction on top of
> many different protocols and not just an SMPP gateway alone.
> 
> Also, dlr-mask handles different scenarios that are not directly related to
> getting a deliver_sm DLR message (for example, a submit_sm_resp would
> trigger a DLR on Kannel side).
> 
> Right now, Kannel only supports value 1/2 (for final success and failure
> respectively) and 17/18 (for intermediate dlr's support, it'd add 16 to the
> parameter).
> 
> There's no way to send a "5" without patching the code. If you want to do
> it, you should start looking at gw/smsc/smsc_smpp.c around this lines:
> 
>     /* ask for the delivery reports if needed */
>     if (DLR_IS_SUCCESS_OR_FAIL(msg->sms.dlr_mask))
>         pdu->u.submit_sm.registered_delivery = 1;
>     else if (DLR_IS_FAIL(msg->sms.dlr_mask) &&
> !DLR_IS_SUCCESS(msg->sms.dlr_mask))
>         pdu->u.submit_sm.registered_delivery = 2;
> 
>     if (DLR_IS_INTERMEDIATE(msg->sms.dlr_mask))
>         pdu->u.submit_sm.registered_delivery += 16;
> 
> Hope it helps,

Yes, it help but then the userguide is vague:

dlr-mask  number (bit mask) is a bit mask composed of:
          1: Delivered to phone,
          2: Non-Delivered to Phone,
          4: Queued on SMSC,
          8: Delivered to SMSC,
         16: Non-Delivered to SMSC.

So, if the 1+4 (equals 5) is set that means Kannel will report delivery
only for 1: Delivered to phone and the userguide should be corrected.


> Alex
> 
> On Tuesday, September 13, 2011, Nikos Balkanas wrote:
> 
> > I don't think so. Either dlr-mask doesn't correspond to bits set directly,
> > or bits requested are contradicting text description. For example dlr-mask =
> > 5 reports delivery success and smsc buffered, but no delivery failure, which
> > is requested. One could argue if SMSc buffered is asked or rather SMSc ACK
> > (and I assume NACK). Obviously the latter. In either case, Mario can always
> > try both values, and see what works.
> >
> > BR,
> > Nikos
> >
> > On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 9:08 PM, Milan P. Stanic 
> > <[email protected]<javascript:_e({}, 'cvml', '[email protected]');>
> > > wrote:
> >
> >> On Tue, 2011-09-13 at 20:45, Nikos Balkanas wrote:
> >> > Sorry, for that dlr-mask should be 27...
> >>
> >> If the OP must set dlr-mask to binary 00101 that is 5 in decimal. So
> >> your previous post was correct.
> >>
> >> > On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 8:41 PM, Nikos Balkanas 
> >> > <[email protected]<javascript:_e({}, 'cvml', '[email protected]');>>
> >> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > > Hi,
> >> > >
> >> > > Have you tried setting dlr-mask to 5?
> >> > >
> >> > > BR,
> >> > > Nikos
> >> > >
> >> > > On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 7:32 PM, Mario Noboa 
> >> > > <[email protected]<javascript:_e({}, 'cvml', '[email protected]');>>
> >> wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > >> hi list,
> >> > >>
> >> > >> I glad to write you. The operator ask me send the submit_sm with
> >> > >> register_deliver parameter in this way:
> >> > >>
> >> > >> .... ..01 = Delivery receipt  : Delivery receipt requested (for
> >> success or
> >> > >> failure) (0x01)
> >> > >> .... 01.. = Message type      : SME delivery acknowledgement
> >> requested
> >> > >> (0x01)
> >> > >> ...0 .... = Intermediate notif: No intermediate notification
> >> requested
> >> > >> (0x00)
> >> > >>
> >> > >> Thats mean to this parameter must be 5 (hexa) equivalent 0000 0101.
> >> > >>
> >> > >> In my logs always register_deliver is in 1 (sendsms with dlr-mask and
> >> > >> dlr-url of course)
> >> > >>
> >> > >> there are any way to do it without modify the code?
> >> > >>
> >> > >> Thanks for your help!
> >> > >>
> >> > >> Mario
> >> > >>
> >> > >>
> >> > >
> >>
> >> --
> >> Kind regards,  Milan
> >> --------------------------------------------------
> >> Arvanta, IT Security        http://www.arvanta.net
> >> Please do not send me e-mail containing HTML code.
> >>
> >>
> >

-- 
Kind regards,  Milan
--------------------------------------------------
Arvanta, IT Security        http://www.arvanta.net
Please do not send me e-mail containing HTML code.

Reply via email to